JUAN GONZALEZ, COUNTY ATTORNEY JUST COST THE COUNTY A FORTUNE

Yesterday, the Texas Supreme Court affirmed my position as an ADA advocate for John Doe.  That case is moving forward, and it may have already cost Chuy Garcia any hope of being able to run for district judge.  The case is simple.  They remand it to the court of appeals to address the subject matter jurisdiction issues.  Chuy Garcia has no defense.

NOW, WHY WILL THE COUNTY COMMISSION GET TWO LETTERS MAKING DEMAND FOR DAMAGES

Yesterday, in retaliation for me seeking criminal charges against two probation officers, the supervisor told me I was not allowed in the probation building.  This is a slam dunk § 1983, based on Free Speech.  He actually had security force me out of the building.  He denied John Doe access to me.  This violated the ADA and they will be sued seeking an immediate injunction. 

When I explained to him the Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals have both issued rulings accepting me as John Doe's ADA Advocate he actually said until the courts give him an order saying he must allow me to be with John Doe, the order does not apply to him.  To believe this, this guy believes it is not illegal to rape people unless a judge has specifically told him so. The law is the law, and you have no right to a personal order from a judge.

It is shocking this idiot is a supervisor.  He is a clear danger to every probationer. He was clear my POA signed by John Doe does not give John Doe the right to wave his privacy.  You cannot be this stupid.

I have a $20 million § 1983.  John Doe has a very clear $20 million claim against the county.  The case is Tennesse v. Lane.  By Monday both demand letters will be before the entire county commission.

THE ULTRA VIRES SUITS

These are suits to basically say the court clerks are refusing to do their job.  The court finds they have failed at their job, and orders them to comply with the law. If they do not the court can take control of the clerk's office. 

Guys I may appear quiet, but I am not.  I've learned this ADOBE program which allows me to attach documents to the federal lawsuit I am preparing so that the judge can read the claim and see the document which supports the claim.  I am doing this for now for the media consultant. He wants to make sure no one is going to get in trouble with defamation.  This is his way of showing the news media the claims are supported by documents.  It is a long process, but I am putting the package together. 

 

I am here.  Word is about to get out as to how many county and district clerks have been hit with an Ultra Vires lawsuit.  The claims against Irma Gilman, wife of ADA Peter Gilman are for sure criminal.  I did not want this, but Saenz wants to prove no judge in Texas will end his criminal enterprise.  This is sad.

HERE IS YOUR PROOF OF WHAT HAPPENS WHEN LAWLESSNESS TAKES CONTROL

Go to minute 7 for all the evidence you need to know Trump through his hateful policies is in fact killing children.  It is hard to watch.  But it was all caught on camera.

Afghanistan: The Trump Administration says no one has died due to aid cuts. This story suggests otherwise | CNN

 WHAT A BUSY WEEK, AND AN AMAZING FRIDAY - PURPOSE WITH FAITH

On a lessor note, the Herald published my letter concerning Ukraine.  My conclusion about Putin being able to restore Imperial Russia was an important breakthrough.  It is not enough to form an opinion; you must have a solid analytical basis to your reason if you are to be proven right. 

THE JOHN DOE CASE IS NOW BEFORE THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

John Doe and his family want this to end.  There is no reason for anyone else to get hurt.  But now, not only has the case been presented to the Court of Criminal Appeals, but it is also before Texas AG Paxton.

I have seen the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reject cases which are later won in federal court.  This court is not motivated by public perception.  Each Justice is 100% protected as a Republican unless challenged by a fellow Republican.  The current court has several new members who replaced older Republicans.  

The force behind that result was Ken Paxton.  Ken Paxton's actions were based on being stripped of his authority to bypass local DAs in his criminal investigations.  These judges and Ken Paxton know all too well; it is time the Texas AG have the right to investigate local corruption when it is shown the DA will not or is part of the corruption.

What I know for sure is the state now knows what claims they will face in federal court in Austin. 

A summary from the brief:

My writing is a bit iffy because I may have a concussion.  I flew into NY late on the 2nd.  On the third I fell into Peconic Bay while stepping up from my brother's boat onto the pier. It was low tide.  My brother lost his hold on the boat, and it pulled away from the dock causing me to fall back and hit my head on his boat and to go under.  It appears I have a lingering concussion.  

 A concussion heals itself over time.  My only issue is I hit the shunt valve protruding from my skull.  If there is a leak, it will need immediate attention.  I am being monitored. 

FROM THE BRIEF

"The court of appeals has refused to accept the motion to recuse on the guise only the court appointed attorney can file such a motion.  The court must understand Relator objected before and after Lawrence Rabb’s appointment because he is an object of the appeal as to ineffective assistance of counsel. The court knew he was conflicted out.

The Court of Criminal Appeals has made known a mandamus will issue when a court fails to properly submit a motion to recuse for consideration. De  Leon v. Aguilar, 127 S.W.3^rd 1 (CCA 2004) Further because the motion to recuse includes a verified claim supported by the record the court of appeals appointed Lawrence Rabb knowing he conspired against Relator at the trial level, the court of appeals is recused as a matter of law. Id.  

The second issue involves trial Judge Gabriela Garcia.  The record submitted herein clearly proves Judge Garcia forced your relator to sign a felony perjury waiver which contained a false claim of no mental illness history.  Judge Garcia had previously crossed examined your Relator on his mental illness history.  The wife of Lawrence Rabb just the day before the Plea filed a motion demanding a mental health examine of  Relator.  Does anyone on this court believe Lawrence Rabb will argue against the conduct of his wife?

Upon learning of the fraud on the court, your relator filed a motion to withdraw the plea bargain. Exhibit 5. It was well before the final judgment.  The record shows the motion, and written communication to Irma Gilman, criminal court coordinator, to set the matter for hearing. See Exhibit 6: Email to Irma Gilman asking for hearing on Motion to Withdraw Plea Bargain. She refused.  Does anyone on this court believe for one second Irma Gilman would set a matter for hearing knowing it challenges the conduct of her husband, the ADA of the court?

The third issue is, the county court at law judge issued an order with a false claim your Relator had been convicted in the felony case.  This is false.  She also issued her order without jurisdiction in the case.  After the original judge transferred the case to an unknown judge, Judge Betancourt took it upon herself to assign herself. Mandamus will also lie to correct a void order, i.e., an order the trial court had no power or jurisdiction to render. Urbish v. 127th Judicial Dist. Court, 708 S.W.2d 429, 431 (Tex. 1986) (orig. proceeding)."

The Court of Criminal Appeals has discretion to decide if it will hear the case. A refusal to hear the case is not a ruling on the merits.  This case is very difficult and complex at the same time.  If they take the short path it will mean a complete win for John Doe, with only minor damage to DA Saenz and his cabal of coconspirators.

Our preference is these ends now without any further damage to anyone. 

SQUARELY BEFORE THE COURT IF THE EFILE SYSTEM WHICH SHUTS THE COURT TO INDIGENCE CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS

AG Paxton has the claim and brief on the issue.  The Court of Criminal Appeals knows this issue is solid and ripe for a federal judge. They will find a solution to this mess.  The question is how far they will go in fashioning a solution. 

 

MUSK'S AMERICA PARTY WILL FAIL, BECAUSE IT IS ABOUT HIM AND NOT THE REPUBLIC

If anyone understands Musk cannot compromise, it is Trump.  Musk by his own words is more antigovernment regulation and spending than Trump.

Texas has two great examples of what happens when the radicalized fiscal conservatives and pro-gun lobby control matters.

Just this week we saw the consequences of Texas Republicans' antiregulation mentality and anti-spending for the social good.

Trump's cuts in the weather service are not the cause of why the Texas Republican Party this term voted against grant money to fund local warning systems.  Trump had nothing to do with the fact Kerr County has no warning system.  Trump had nothing to do with the people not heeding multiple warnings about the impending flash flooding.  In at least one summer camp the owners heeded the warning and got all of the children out in time.  The multiple warnings only went to people who agreed to receive same by phone.  Kerr County as a matter of policy chose to not invest in such a system.

The notion until DOGE cut funding to the national weather service the NWS never made a mistake in underestimating the amount of rain fall is just absurd.

The problem is Republican Party policy in Texas concerning needed spending on social services, and policies.  The state representative from Kerr voted this term to not fund grant money for a warning system for Kerr.

This is all in line with Elon Musk's idea of fiscal conservatism.   True fiscal conservatism spends the money wisely needed to protect the community.  It is opposed to reckless spending and not needed spending.

Elon Musk and Texas Republicans both support a blanket system of opposing all spending without regard for consequences.

This will not fly in the US, especially with Elon Musk's very public rightwing position on other social issues.

Elon Musk may know rockets, but he knows nothing about economics. He has no concept of how spending for the safety net multiplies throughout the national economy. 

Elon Musk's America Party will fail faster than it started. It will be Elon Musk's alter ego, such as Starbase. 

TEXAS SUPREME COURT CHIEF JUSTICE REMINDS LAWYERS IF JUST 10 OF THEM PETITION TO REMOVE A DISTRICT COURT JUDGE, THE COURT WILL GIVE IT DUE CONSIDERATION 

You will not convince me we cannot find 10 articulate lawyers to petition for the Removal of Gabriela Garcia.  Too many of you are urging me to continue to push for her removal.

Here is a key point for me, if you think you are going to run for district court judge while remaining silent about the corruption in Cameron County you are wrong.

I will have a lot to say about the cowards who want to be a judge but refuse to speak the truth about what is happening.

When the time comes, I will prove I have Gabby Garcia more honest chances to end this nightmare than I ever thought I would afford a judge.  She cannot bring herself to do the right thing.  I am pursuing it with the Commission on Judicial Conduct, but they can take years.

"And when we find a serious problem, we can put the judge on notice that his performance is unacceptable. If he can’t turn it around, the Constitution says we can do something about it. Article 15, section 8 allows the Legislature, on the Governor’s recommendation, to remove a judge for several reasons, including willful neglect of duty or incompetence. Article 15, section 6 allows the Supreme Court, on the petition of ten lawyers, to remove a district judge who “negligently fails to perform his duties as Judge; or who shall fail to execute in a reasonable measure the business in his courts.” These provisions show us that the Framers of our Constitution knew that judges have to be capable, qualified people who can manage a courtroom. The Framers also knew that elections might occasionally give us unqualified judges. Their answer wasn’t—tough luck, vote them out in four years. No. They gave us tools to fix these problems in the rare cases when they arise. And if we forget about these tools or we don’t use them because we’re afraid it will be difficult or we’ll be criticized for it, then we’re not allowing our Constitution to operate as it was designed."

... .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE HAS MADE CLEAR HE INTENDS TO COLLECT DATA ON THE BAD JUDGES

"Article V, section 31 of the Constitution makes the Supreme Court responsible for the efficient administration of the judicial branch. Using that authority, as well as authority you’ve given us, we are gathering data to help us identify problem judges. We don’t want to use statistical metrics like case clearance rates as blunt instruments because they don’t tell the whole story, but they are very useful tools. I believe current law provides all the tools we need to identify the problems and to deal with them, and this Supreme Court intends to do that, with the help of the Regional Presiding Judges and others. We don’t need to burden all the good judges across our state with extra paperwork mandated by the Legislature. We don’t need to do that in order to figure out where the problems are. We can find the problems, and we intend to do so."

Chief Justice's State of the Union

 

BROWNSVILLE LAUNCHES BROWNSVILLE RENAISSANCE WITHOUT FANFARE

When I saw this, I thought great.  You would think the city would have created a poster to promote Brownsville Renaissance.  Nope.

I believe in it.  I think an Old Towne Brownsville will bring millions to Brownsville.  If done right people will come from all over South Texas.

We need another parking garage off the main street.  We need a roped off area where people can mingle.  We need the unique attractions which might bring people in.  A large shop with souvenirs would be nice.  People love glass blowing.  It has to be more then nice bars and restaurants.

This is a great investment to promote Brownsville.

Click here to see Press Release