THIS MORNING VP JD VANCE SNUBBED JEWS IN THE US, ISRAEL AND WORLDWIDE BY ASKING FOR PRAYERS FOR CHRISTIANS AS WE APPROACH EASTER, BUT NOT JEWS FOR PASSOVER WHICH SHARES THE HOLIDAY WITH CHRISTIANS

Had a Democrat done this, MAGA news would be all over it.  It is no secret Vance blames Isael for this mess.  Israel does not represent the Jewish faith, and we must keep this in mind. 

This was done on live TV as Trump was mumbling his gradiences. 

 

CITY OF BROWNSVILLE SUIT, JOHN DOE, AND MY CANCER CONCERN

I will seek a rehearing on Judge Olvera's Order dismissing my § 1983 against the COB.  I have no issue with Judge Overa's order, save his failure to explore what constitutes a public concern.  His subjective conclusion my case does not constitute a matter of public concern, is wrong.  Respect mandates I allow Judge Olvera to review my legal argument, before taking him on appeal.

The key facts are simple, did Omar Ochoa engage in a matter of public concern when he called Texas Lone Star and told them they did not have to remedy the code violations, after Omar Ochoa was informed, I asked that he be investigated for failure to do his job?

Judge Olvera did not review what constitutes public concern.  He bypassed that part of the analysis, and instead provided his subjective opinion, not based in law. This is why you afford the judge an opportunity to correct his mistake.

"“Exposing governmental inefficiency and misconduct is a matter of considerable significance” Garcetti v. Ceballos, 547 U.S.  410, 425 (2006)

This is from a trial court opinion in Georgia.

"The Court finds Strang's complaint contains sufficient detail to find she spoke as a citizen on a matter of public concern. Generally speaking, the public has a keen interest in discovering wrongdoing or breaches of the public trust on the part of its public officials. See id. 148-49 ("Nor did Myers seek to bring to light actual or potential wrong- doing or breach of public trust on the part of Connick and others."); Garcetti, 547 U.S. at 425 ("Exposing government inefficiency and misconduct is a matter of considerable significance."). "A 'core concern' of the First Amendment is the protection of whistleblowers who report government wrongdoing."

Here is the key:  Judge Olvera must find Omar Ochoa with the city did not act in a matter of public concern when he told Texas Lone Star they did not have to remedy the code violations, after I demanded the city of Brownsville investigate Omar Ochoa.

THE CASE OF JOHN DOE

The case remains before the Court of Criminal Appeals.  Texas AG Paxton is part of the investigation.  So, we wait.  

UPDATE ON CANCER SCARE IS SURREAL

MY CANCER SCARE

I finally get to speak with a scheduler.  I ask her to verify the test being ordered.  She says it is okay because DHR lab had just stated they can do the lab.  She lied, and I know it for sure.  I insisted she give me the name of test being requested.

She says Community Care Urology requested psi-BYH.  No such test exists so why then did she say DHR already confirmed they could do the test?

I spent nearly an hour on the phone with a supervisor who was streaming through the endless encyclopedias of excuses.  The test is psi-HYB Panel.

He cannot understand he needs to fix the test request.  He wants to focus on the alleged failures of his staff.  No, first you fix the problem, and investigate your staff.  They cannot comprehend the urgency is endless findings pointing towards prostate cancer.  This is the core problem with government employees, they cannot be fired or sued, so they just lie. 

I am still holding to a belief all the lab results pointing to cancer are wrong, and in fact the problem is a rare form of inflammation. But if it is cancer, I can assure everyone I will not let it go until everyone in community care who dropped the ball is fired. 

After I shower, I will go to a walk-in clinic to get the referral to LabCorp. The walk-in clinic will charge the VA, but I suspect the lab will be charged to Medicare. 

On LabCorp, that was my request which as a veteran I get to choose.  The community care employee would not allow for me to use Lab Corp.  DHR IS NOT an option because their urologist is a very hard no-go as a care option.

IT IS BEYOND SURREAL:  I asked the supervisor when the problem may be fixed.  He said he did not know.  All he has to do is call the nurse in CC Urology and ask her to change the test to psi-HYB Panel, and the voucher will go out.  Something so simple is not something he can understand. 

ORIGINAL POST 

I am at a loss.  For a week my doctor has demanded over and over again that Community Care send an authorization to Lab Corp, to do the specialized lab work which predicts possibility of prostate cancer.  Other than repeating her demand the voucher be issued, she will not help.

Community Care every day claims they cannot issue the voucher because they cannot get ahold of me. They claim I am not answering my phone.  So, I say, okay I am on the phone now, let's handle it.  Nope, they will only work with me when I answer my phone.  They claim to have left multiple voicemails.  The problem is, while I am on the phone with the VA, my live T-Mobile bill actually shows me I am on the phone with the VA.  There is no record in my bill of the VA calling me from Community Care.  

In the last months, the VA IG issued a conclusion Community Care is failing at its job and denying veteran's care.

If by noon, no voucher has issued, I will go to a day and night clinic and try and put it on my Medicare, or I will pay cash, and ask for a referral to LabCorp to perform the advanced lab work.  This is sad.

 

THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT IS FRANLIN. 

The founding fathers knew full well the people are the sovereigns, and not the government. The government sits subordinate to the people.  A question I am about to pose in federal court with this entire mess is, is adherence to your oath as a public official discretionary or mandatory.

I get the press will say this is stupid.  It is not.  If adherence to your oath of office as a public figure is discretionary, then what compels any elected official to uphold the constitution and laws.  This is what is wrong with the immunity doctrine. A subordinate employee of the people (sovereign) cannot be immune from suit by the sovereign.  There is no immunity and to the extent the courts have found same, it is based on a false belief the public figure is the sovereign and not the people. 

 

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION INFORMED ME I CAN FILE A COMPLAINT AGAINST OMAR OCHOA OVER HIS MISHANDLING OF MY CASE

They will not tell me the result of any pending complaint.  They were clear, if I file the complaint, they will explain whether code enforcement is discretionary.  Will John Cowen authorize use of your tax dollars to pay for his defense?  You bet.

I WILL PUSH AS HARD AS I CAN TO SEEK PERMISSION TO DEPOSE LINDA MACIAS

She is vindictive and petty.  My complaints about the huge pothole at the end of my cul-de-sac goes unresolved.  About two months ago the postman had to rock his truck to get out of the pothole.  It is in front of a home which has visitors all day long due to a family illness.  Between these cars, and the garbage trucks the hole gets bigger and bigger by the day.  It is so wrong these family members dealing with a family illness have to try and park everyday around a huge pothole, because Linda has a score to settle with me.

I know how my neighbors feel about her.  She is not well liked.  She is so petty she posed in a pothole in another commissioner's district bragging about getting it repaired, while refusing any help with the pothole in my cul-de-sac.  This is the behavior you expect of a five-year-old while having a temper tantrum on the playground. The neighbors I spoke with had no problem assuming my trash not being picked up was classic Macias.  We know her.  She has zero tolerance for dissent.  Macias thinks compliance with her oath of office is discretionary. It is not.

To be clear, at this point I have no proof who ordered my trash to not be picked up.  But I know and my neighbors know Cowen and Macias are vindictive people.  I will do my best to force discovery under a contempt motion with Judge Rolando Olvera.  The city clearly retaliated over the remand while leaving the door open as to whether Omar Ochoa violated my rights. 

 

DID JOHN COWEN OR SOMEONE ELSE IN THE CITY ORDER RETALIATION FOR MY LAWSUIT BEING REMANDED TO STATE COURT?

On Friday my trash was put out at about 8:30 a.m., such as every week.  I checked with my neighbors, and everyone had their trash picked up. The neighbors who were paying attention verified the trash was picked up in the early afternoon.

So why did everyone but me get their trash picked up?

I am basically happy with judge Rolando Olvera's order and opinion.  On balance I believe it was designed to help me.  But he made one mistake.  He did not go into the case law which addresses a public concern.  He just made a subjective conclusion the facts of my case were not of a public concern in terms of the retaliation.

I will be asking for the rehearing and leave to amend based on a claim the city retaliated over his ruling and did not retrieve my trash.  It was out where it belongs hours before the pickup time but left at the curb.

I need leave to depose the drivers to learn why they chose to not empty my trash.  I will be making demand on Redfish to provide a date and time when their drivers can be deposed.  If the city ordered retaliation by ordering my trash not to be retrieved it is a basis for contempt of court.  I have the right to the truth, and I am hopeful Judge Olvera will give me that time. 

 

THE LATEST ADVANCED LAB WORK CONTINUES TO POINT TO PROSTATE CANCER

The phi-HYB test is so advanced, VA doctors cannot order it be done through the VA lab.  A second run is being requested directly to an outside lab.  The doctors cannot fix the lack of care at the VA.  

The VA draws blood all the time and send it to outside labs.  But for this test the VA requires you go directly to an outside lab.  The order has been made.  We are fine and there will be no delay.

I chose my San Antonio specialist based on his surgical skills.  The diagnostic process should be the easy part, but I have learned it is not.  He clearly looked me in the face and said he has debunked all the research which shows high insulin dosages can give a false lower PSA. 

According to a host of sources to include Cancer.Org, you cannot rely on a man's PSA if they are on a high dosage of insulin.  It can force a low PSA.  There are actually warnings against relying on a man's PSA results if they are on a high dosage of insulin.  The warning specifically says such reliance could mean missing the cancer diagnosis.

SO, WHAT ARE WE DOING?

Last night I reduced my insulin dosage from 100 units to 50 units.  It was not random.  At 50 units my blood sugar is the same as at 100 units.  This morning my blood sugar was 152.  Yesterday morning with 100 units of insulin my blood sugar was 151.

So, on Thursday next we will redo the phi-HYB blood test on the lower insulin level.  If the PSA goes back up then we can argue insulin impacts PSA.

Right now, my phi-HYB puts me at a 33.3% chance of prostate cancer.  My number is on the high side so it will not take much of a jump in the PSA to put me at a 50% chance of prostate cancer.

The protocol is clear.  It is time for a biopsy.  I have to wait until Monday to hear from my SA doctor.  He is in surgery days.  I have to wait for a clinic test. 

I am 60 days since the critical warning for prostate cancer.  Everything which has been done has been at my direction.  Had I allowed the VA to do as it pleases, my  follow-up would be in June. 

Okay I am exhausted.  I need a nap. 

 

SOMETHING TO PONDER