VICENTE GONZALEZ CANNOT HIDE IN THE SHADOWS AFTER VOTING TO CONTINUE TO FUND ISRAEL'S GENOCIDE OF THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE

I will assume Vicente's Republican opponent will be no better.  But his opponent is not the one who voted today to continue aid to help Israel with its war of genocide against the Palestinians.

All I can say is not in my name.

For a full list of Democrats who voted with Israel today, click. 

 

 

GABRIELA GARCIA [PEDRAZA] WITH JORGE PEDRAZA

The photo is dated 2019.  In the same post Jorge Pedraza said of Judge Garcia, "Very loyal, honest, and understanding."

I am very concerned Judge Garcia was never informed about security measures Texas provides to judges.  There is way too much information online about her which is public, which should be suppressed.  Texas law provides this benefit. But you have to ask for it.

It is fair to say the address tied to her and Jorge Pedraza is his separate property, via inheritance. I cannot say she lives there, but public records have tax bills being sent to the address in her name. 

Public records certainly explain why Jorge Pedraza considers her very loyal.  This is clearly a private matter between them.

But publicly, she has represented him in court.

JORGE C. PEDRAZA FILED SUIT FOR JJ PEDRAZA IN 2022, AS NEXT OF FRIEND

The case is 022-CCL-00680.  The case was filed by attorney Javier Villarreal.  Javier appears to be the family attorney for personal injury. I assume Judge Garcia informs all defense counsel the family uses Javier Villarreal as their personal injury attorney.  Such knowledge would form a basis for recusal in all such cases.

NOW ENTERS LOUIS SOROLA

Public records show Louis Sorola was representing Jorge Pedraza at the same time he was conspiring against John Doe.  Gabriela Garcia knew this, concealed it, and should have recused herself.  It was a car crash case in Cyndi Hinojosa's court.  You should know when Sorola filed the case, he chose Cyndi Hinojosa as forum shopping.  He could not file it in his wife's court, and at the time the Sorola's were in a battle with Linda Salazar over weddings.  The case is 2023-GSC-00171.

Either Gabriela Garcia or Jorge Pedraza were paying Sorola, at the same time Garcia was guaranteeing Sorola was being paid with public funds to screw over John Doe. Now because it is a car crash case, Sorola could have been on a percentage, or did it for free.  Property damage cases only are generally filed in JP court.  If it was a freebee, that makes it worse for all concerned.

If this is not an indictable offense nothing is.

I am really hopeful before midnight I will have the mandamus filed against the COB in my case, so I can then move forward on this case.

A RECKLESS CHILD HAS NO DEFENSE

Jorge Javier Pedraza has a ticket before Bennie Ochoa Jr.  It is unsafe speed, traffic crash dated May 15, 2026.

Two weeks later he is charged with driving 76-mph in a 65-mph zone.  The case is before Cyndi Hinojosa. She needs to recuse herself from the case.  No Cameron County judge should be allowed to preside over the case of another judge's family member.

In both cases the address listed for Pedraza is the same address tax records record the residence of Gabriela Garcia and a Jorge Pedraza Sr.  

I will say I have very little trust in Cameron County tax records.  But I can legally rely on what I found online.  

I think it is safe that since Jorge Javier Pedraza is the same Pedraza listed on the residence of Gabriela Garcia and Jorge Pedraza, they are all related.

So, two weeks after driving in an unsafe speed and crashing, Pedraza gets stopped again for speeding.

Anyone want to defend this young man as not being reckless in his decision making?

I am inferring facts based on the fact Pedraza in all his cases including the PI case is tied to the same address.

So, he stands next to a parking lot fight and gets pushed into the fight, and his mommy wants us to believe he is a careful son. 

I am certain the bar owner's attorney will develop all of this, but Pedraza seems to me to be a reckless child of a judge who believes he can get away with things. 

I will note, when I speak to attorneys about Gabriela Garcia, they go silent.  Noone seems to know if she was ever married to Jorge Pedraza or is currently married.  But public records have them sharing an address, and at a time at the same address Gabriela Garcia was known as Gabriela Pedraza.

Further, public records show Gabriela Garcia has represented Jorge Pedraza in court at least twice.

How I link them all I do not disclose for security reasons. 

 

WHAT IS UP WITH BROWNSVILLE CITY ATTORNEY WILL TREVINO AND THE CLOSING OF THE BARS ON PABLO KISEL AND MORRISON?

UPDATE AND CORRECTION AS TO JORGE JAVIER PEDRAZA, JUDGE GABRIELA GARCIA'S SON

The update and correct does not really help Pedraza, it may make it worse.

Montoya in December before taking down his post on the story, claimed Pedraza was a good Samaritan trying to stop a fight.  According to Pedraza's attorneys this is not correct.

In the original and amended lawsuit Pedraza's attorneys claim Pedraza was pushed into the fight where upon he became injured.

I will give the direct quote from the lawsuit.  But here are the facts.  Pedraza was in the parking lot of the bar, standing around watching the altercation.  He was close enough that upon being pushed he was injured in the fight.

So, this is the essence of the claim, if you are so close to a parking lot bar fight that you can be pushed into the fight and then are injured, it is the fault of the parking lot owners.

Any judge of minimum competence will dismiss this personal injury lawsuit forthwith. 

THE QUOTE FROM THE LAWSUIT:

"he [Pedraza] was inadvertently pushed into the middle of the physical altercation." 

So, this is what Gabriela Garcia wants you to believe.  Her son is entitled to a million dollars because he chose to stand right next to a bar parking lot fight, he became injured while observing the fight.  Really guys?  The case needs to be dismissed immediately.  You cannot enter a dangerous area and then blame the owner of the property because you became injured.

You cannot walk onto a hazardous property which you know is hazardous and then sue the owner when you become injured. 

I was shocked to learn the Herald requested records which suggest they may be looking at painting Pedraza as anything but innocent.  

Defense counsel is clearly seeking documents which could make it appear Pedraza is not some clean kid.  But to be clear if defense counsel gets the documents, the documents could make the kid to look good. 

I am paying for research so that I will have key documents.  There is so much more at so many levels.

ORIGINAL POST

The following is Will Trevino being quoted in the Herald.

Social Media speculated about why the city objected to visiting Judge Robert Garza.  In the process they missed the entire story.  The objection was one of right requiring no reason.

"When asked why the city objected to Garza hearing the case, Treviño gave no comment, adding that it would give away the city’s legal strategy.

He noted that the city was trying to “consolidate” the case to the 107th state District Court with Judge Benjamin Euresti Jr."  This statement was a clear indication of the city's strategy.

The city wants Noe Garza to control the personal injury case filed by Judge Gabby Garcia's son, Jorge Javier Pedraza after an alleged stabbing, and the bar closing case. The claim, which will need to be verified in court, is Pedraza entered the fight to help another person. (This has now been corrected, see above.)

So, this is how it works.  Ben Euresti, the current judge of the 107th, until January 2027, will find the bar violated the code, if the cases are consolidated.  I do not see how it drags on to January, but that decision could end with Noe Garza.  I read somewhere a new visiting judge has been assigned to the bar case, (in the 357th Judicial District Court) but there is no indication of same on the docket sheet.  

After Judge Euresti or Noe Garza find the bar violated the code, Pedraza's attorney uses that finding as a basis for liability by the owner of the parking lot and bar. 

WHAT IS THE LAW IN PERSONAL INJURY ON PROPERTY

The law is pretty basic as to property liability.  The lead case, some 30 years old or older is simple.  If you slip on a strawberry at the grocery store, and fall, the grocery story is not liable unless, 1- they had adequate time to know the strawberry was on the floor, or someone told them, or 2- they knew the display was such strawberries would fall to the floor.

In the case of the parking lot, the nature of the beast put the owners on notice fights were possible thereby making them possibly liable for want of proper security, or security was added and could not break up the fight in time based on how long the owners knew of the fight.  If the facts show security immediately rushed the fight, the owner should be in good shape. In the latter case if it can be shown security was doing nothing and just watching the fight, liability could attach.

BUT NOW THE FACTS

The learned jurist Gabby Garcia claims that the owners had a duty to stop her underaged son, for drinking purposes, from entering the fight voluntarily and should therefore be held liable for her son's decision to enter the fight. (Again, this has been corrected from the original social media reporting.  The lawsuit clearly alleges that Pedraza while observing the fight was pushed into the fight.  The facts now stated in the lawsuit should be enough to end the lawsuit with the dismissal. 

Because Pedraza was hospitalized lab work may show if he had alcohol in his system.

The social media reports say nothing to indicate Pedraza was an innocent bystander.  Even then if you stand around to watch a fight and get dragged into it, that is on you for standing around in a dangerous environment.  The facts reported in social media if true should result in the Pedraza case being tossed.  You cannot walk into a fight, even to help a 3rd party, and then blame the property owners for your injury.  

NOE GARZA SHOULD ANNOUNCE NOW ONCE HE TAKES THE BENCH HE WILL HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE PERSONAL INJURY CASE OR THE BAR CLOSING CASE

I want to make clear, this post is based on Will Trevino stating the city has a strategy which includes consolidating the two cases.  Will Trevino certainly knows a win for the city could mean millions for Gabby Garcia's son, Pedraza.

This stinks to high heaven, and everyone knows it now that the story is out.

So, let's get straight how this works, Art McDonald in my case can recuse himself on his own motion without any reason, but Ben Euresti and Noe Garza can stay in a case which benefits the son of a fellow judge. 

This story is developing.

I am not disclosing how I know Pedraza is Gabby Garcia's son.  When dealing with a judge there are security issues which should be considered in your reporting. 

 

THE STORY WHICH WILL SHAKE THE BROWNSVILLE CITY COMMISSION

Everything good about Brownsville comes from its residents.  This is despite the unrelenting corruption with the city commission.

Tomorrow morning the story will hit.  It is done; all I have to do is publish it.

 

WHAT IS SO AMAZING TO ME, I AM NONE OF THESE

 

FIRST TRUMP CHANGES THE NAME OF THE GULF OF MEXICO, AND NOW THEY WANT TO CHANGE THE NAME OF BOCA CHICA TO CYBER BEACH

UPDATE:

Erin Gamez announces Boda Chica will remain Boca Chica.  So, we won.

The unanswered question is, how did this happen, and where was the city and county openly opposing this. We need answers.

You know why these abuses happen?  Because our elected officials fail us at every turn.  They want to rob us of our heritage.

While Gamez's notice to her constituents may be helpful, it may be too late.

They renamed Fronton St. to an Anglo name.  Fronton in Spanish means bluff.  It was named over the bluff overlooking the Rio Grande before it was dammed. 

We need to find out who knew about this and when at the city and county.  There has to be accountability.

Where was the city and county keeping us informed and opposing this?