CHIEF JUSTICE JIMMY BLACKLOCK DEFIES ME TO SEEK HIS CONTEMPT

This is not complex, other than in Texas the law has no place in our society.  My only chance of winning this is if the press picks up on what is happening.  The Application for Stay being filed with Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, has better chances than most, but remains a longshot.  The issue for the Supreme Court is, should they intervene when a state judge interferes in a federal proceeding.  It seems obvious to me the Supreme Court knows the importance of protecting the jurisdiction of the federal courts. 

On November 11, 2025, I notified the court in a filing the matter had been removed to federal court, thereby divesting the Texas Supreme Court of any jurisdiction in the matter.

The Texas Supreme Court ignored the posting and issued three separate orders in the matter.

The case law I am about to give you was used by the COB attorney Heather Scott to argue to federal Judge Rolando Olvera, remanding the case to state court was not needed because with the removal to federal court the state court lost all jurisdiction in the matter.  I totally agree with her, but the jurisdiction is renewed on remand.  Heather Scott made an argument in bad faith and now we have a mess.

Once the notice of removal is filed, any subsequent state action is absolutely void and coram non judice.  Feliciano, 589 U.S. at 64 (quoting Kern v. Huidekoper, 103 U.S. 485, 493 (1881), and Steamship Co. v. Tugman, 106 U.S. 118, 122 (1882)).” 

Chief Justice Blacklock has now been given two chances to address the improper conduct of the court.  The court is clearly being notified its three orders are a legal nullity.  In both cases the Chief Clerk, Blake A. Hawthorne issued legal rulings that the orders are final and no challenge to the orders will be accepted.

In the second attempt to provide the court an opportunity to correct its mistakes with some plausible explanation, I asked that the Clerk Hawthorne be removed from being involved in the case.  Blake Hawthornes office a second time refused to file the Motion under the claim the void orders are final.

The law firm of Jackson Walker is a major problem in this case. They use their ties to the Texas Supreme Court to needlessly increase the cost of litigation and hide key documents.

In this case Chris Mugica, a partner at Jackson Walker repeatedly refused to release the mandatory disclosures as part of the original discovery.  Once forced to release the documents, they contained the contract between Texas Lone Star and Mugica's client FTL finance.  The document clearly showed Texas Lone Star was barred from receiving the loan money until they produced a contract between myself and Texas Lone Star.  No such contract exists.  Texas Lone Star stole the money and then left the project incomplete.  

The Supreme Court clerk relies on the fact, former Chief Justice Nathan Hecht is now a partner at Jackson Walker and the fact the clerk at one time worked for Jackson Walker.

Okay I have to get out the door for a doctor's appointment which is sure to last the remainer of the day.

This is not edited.

In the morning the § 1983 demand letter will go out to all parties to include, Texas Lone Star, its bonding company, the entire Texas Supreme Court, the Chief Clerk, Nathan Hecht and others.