TEXAS CHIEF JUSTICE NATHAN HECHT LOSES HIS MIND AND THREATENS ME WITH A STATE BAR COMPLAIN IF I CONTINUE TO DEMAND HE PERFORM HIS ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES AGAINST REGIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE MISSY MEDARY

 You cannot make this stuff up.   It is simple, Missy Medary has a legal duty to accept complaints against the local CPS judge.  In this case Judge Belton.  Even CPS became so frustrated with Saenz that they took the case from him and eventually dismissed it.

The CPS judge, Judge Belton, reports to the Regional Administrative Judge, Missy Medary.  The complaint proves that the judge used what he knew was perjured testimony against this mother. The ADA who used the perjury, Latoya Colley.  Oh, who do you say, the ADA Cesar DeLeon used racist comments against.  His language was dead wrong, but his assessment of her was nearly 100% correct.  

The complaint against Belton proves that although Texas law dismisses the original court appointed attorney if the mother does not ask for an attorney, the judge will ignore the law and keep Liz Garza on the case. I verified with the county although dismissed from the case as a matter of law, Liz Garza continued to bill the county. 

The complaint shows the case should have been dismissed on day one because under Texas law and federal law you cannot sue a parent if the children see the domestic abuse.

The police report is clear.  The abuser knocked down the door and pulled a screwdriver on the victim and her brother.

Saenz refused to prosecute the abuser, which is a basis for the removal of Saenz from the office of the DA.

So. using the administrative process I demanded Nathan Hecht force Missy Medary to do her job, and his office responded that if I continue to communicate with him, he will bring me before the State Bar.

I can assure you Nathan Hecht knows exactly who I am.  In my brother's case, I forced him to reverse himself because he was clueless about how recusals work.  He was not happy about that. 

So what does he know that he is threatening me with a State Bar complaint?

The letter is odd because he says he will file all the documents with the district court to be filed in a case.  He does not identify the case.  The CPS case is dismissed, so there is nothing which the Texas Supreme Court will hear.

It in part relates to a criminal case.  The Texas Supreme Court has no jurisdiction in a criminal case.  So does he intend to taint the criminal case with his refusal to do his administrative job?