JUDGE BANALES LIES IN AN OFFICIAL CRIMINAL FILING WITH THE INTENT TO TAINT THE PROCESS - THE FACTS ARE IN HIS EMAILS

John Doe received an email from Judge Banales discussing dates for the hearing on the motion to recuse.  John Doe provided a date recommended by Judge Banales, but he also told Judge Banales the rules were not being followed and he was not sent a copy of his order of appointment or the referral by Gabby Garcia asking for a hearing.  There is no discretion in the law on this issue. 

The Order assigning Judge Banales should include the authority to rule on other issues.  John Doe needed the Order to know the extent of Banales powers.

NOW REMEMBER JUDGE BANALES STATED IN HIS COURT FILING HE NEVER OPENED THE EMAILS

JUDGE BANALES LIES BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE CANNOT BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

If Judge Banales did not read the email, why then did he respond to John Doe with a copy of his appointment?

Also of note, it was John Doe forwarding the ex parte email to him, to ADA Javier Lozano.  Judge Banales kept the ADA out of the loop. 

Judge Banales lied and he knows it.  Missy Medary the Region Administrative Judge also knows it. The lie was a criminal act with the intent to taint a criminal proceeding.

John Doe will be filing a motion to dismiss the case, based on the actions of Judge Banales.

Also, under the law, everyone concerned has refused to forward the proper documents to John Doe.  For example, the law commands he receive a copy of Gabby Garcia's order of referral to Judge Medary. 

There is a question of law as to whether or not Gabby Garcia recused herself as a matter of law.  The law commands her to inform Missy Medary within 3 business days of her intent to either recuse herself or ask for a hearing.  Gabby Garcia waited 11 days.  What is the point of the 3-business day rule, if Gabby Garcia can simply ignore it?  The question is, did Missy Medary illegally appointed Judge Banales after Gabby Garcia failed to comply with the 3-business day rule.

THE BOARD OF JUDGES, MEANING ALL THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGES, ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF THIS.  THEY CONTROL PRETRIAL RELEASE.  THEY KNOW LUIS SAENZ IS PARTY TO DEFRAUDING THE TAXPAYERS BY TURNING A BLIND EYE TO GABBY GARCIA TO APPOINTING THREE ATTORNEYS IN ONE CASE.

GLORIA RINCONES TURNED AWAY FROM THE FACT CPS JUDGE BELTON CONTINUED TO ALLOW LIZ GARZA TO BILL THE COUNTY AS A COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY AFTER SHE WAS REMOVED AS A MATTER OF LAW.

The Texas criminal justice system is a mess.  There is a remedy for local residents to go after a criminal DA who is running his office as a criminal enterprise.  It is called removal.  Now that I have said I am going to do it, I have to do it to avoid a possible criminal charge of intimidation.  The only way Saenz avoids it is to resign for health reasons.

THE DISTRICT COURT JUDGES HAVE A LEGAL DUTY TO REFER THIS ENTIRE MESS TO AG PAXTON

They have been told in writing of their legal duty to refer this mess to AG Ken Paxton.  I cannot, in that only certain people have the authority to ask the AG to intervene. 

Every district court judge has been informed of their duty.  They will not perform their duty.  The package will go to AG Paxton demanding he investigate why the Board of Judges turned a blind eye to Saenz ongoing criminal enterprise, and defrauding of the taxpayers.

I remain available to speak with certain people.  bobbywc58@yahoo.com