LOUIS SOROLA LOSES IT IN COURT WHILE ATTACKING HIS CLIENT, AND JUDGE GARCIA FINDS IT ACCEPTABLE CONDUCT.

These two believe every federal and state agency are going to look at the transcripts and find no wrongdoing.  This is not going to happen.  I have to be patient.

Sorola on the record:

" MR. SOROLA: Yes, I have discovery but my client -- now that he's questioning my voracity I would like to file all of the emails he sent me with the Court -- and his uncle's, too. I've been threatened with legal action, I've been threatened with Federal Court, being turned over to the FBI. I mean, I would like to file all of that now that my voracity has been questioned, Judge"

For the record I have no relationship to John Doe.  Sorola loves to call the people I help my family.  It is just a lie.  A lie he has paid Montoya to print.

Sorola demand Judge Garcia depose John Doe as to his complaint to the state her court reporter is now facing 3 complaints for refusing to provide a free transcript to John Doe,

" MR. SOROLA: There's an attachment to the mandamus that has been filed. And there's quite a few emails, Judge. 

 THE COURT: Mr. John Doe, you are objecting to Mrs. Roberts to being the court reporter because your right was violated? Is that what you're stating in this email 

... .

 So why do you need a court record? I take it by your silence that you do not have an answer for me; is that correct? 

THE DEFENDANT: Not at the moment. 

 THE COURT: Did you need a court record from Mrs. Roberts, Mr. Sorola? MR. SOROLA: No, Judge. We haven't -- I haven't been able to do anything. I do have discovery. I've looked at the case."

So, what you have here is Gabby Garcia at Louis Sorola's request deposing John Doe to create a record which they believe will protect Gabby's court reporter.

What the record shows is clear bias by Gabby Garcia and Louis Sorola.  John Doe has the right to defend himself against this conduct.

Does anyone think Sorola is going to demand a record which shows he is working for the DA and against his client.  I would be shocked if Sorola has any appellate record or knows how to preserve error.  

The denial of the mandamus using the requested record was bogus.  The court of appeals, which will change significantly on January 1, 2025, is playing along to protect Gabriela Garcia.  Here is the scam.  Gabriela Garcia will not sign orders overriding John Doe's rights, so the court of appeals finds the court record is insufficient with the order in writing, but it is in the record. 

Historically the court of appeals will order the trial judge to sign the subject orders, but they did not here.

Now who believes Sorola would demand an order which removes him from the case.

Sorola wants people to believe he cannot defend his client because of the adverse relationship.

Now remember this begins with Sorola paying Montoya to attack John Doe's family, and defend Gabriela Garcia, as an attorney, and Korina Barraza as the ADA.  

He walked away from the case for months instead of filing a motion to dismiss.

He does not need to speak with his client to file defense motions.  His claim he cannot speak with his client is a lie.  When we get to court, he gets Gabby Garcia to illegally restrain John Doe and be taken to the back where Sorola can say and do anything he wants. A formal federal criminal charge will be filed on this illegal detention of John Doe off the record. 

This is what happened with Lawrence Rabb and his wife.  They cut a deal without John Doe's consent.  I have that record.  John Doe had been to court enough to know the con,

Sorola and Rabb demanded in a backroom that John Doe plead guilty to possession of a few prescription pills, which in the past had been prescribed by his doctor.  I am in a lot of trouble if anyone checks my prescription container on my key chain.  There is a controlled substance in it. If I start to have breathing problems, I can pop the pill and rapidly increase the blood to the lungs.

When I travel like most people I use a pill box.  I do not bring my prescriptions with me. I just load the pill box with what I need.  According to Saenz this is a crime. 

BUT THE REALITY IS THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE

Sorola and Rabb tried to get John Doe to plead guilty to the misdemeanor case, and do a year in jail, in exchange for Gabby Garcia dismissing the felony case wherein there is an eyewitness there was no crime.  Nothing but choice prevents Sorola and Rabb from securing the written statement of the eyewitness there was no crime. Also, the alleged facts in the indictment are not supported by the affidavits of the arresting deputies. 

THE SCAM JOHN DOE FIGURED OUT ON HIS OWN

So, he pleads guilty in Estela Chavez court and agrees to a year in jail for a first-time misdemeanor for possession of a prescription drug to aid sleep, which has been prescribed by his doctor in the past.  When people are down to a few pills, they may be in a pill box, with no written prescription.

Had they completed the scam, after being sentenced in Estela Chavez-Vasquez's court they were to go back to Gabby Garcia's court wherein Javier Lozano would ask to drop the criminal charges as part of a plea bargain in Estela's court.

Here is the problem, John Doe has heard Gabby Garcia repeatedly tell defendants she was free to reject a plea bargain.  John Doe asked me if he could withdraw his guilty plea on the prescription possession case, if Gabby Garcia rejected the plea bargain.  I said no.  She can still order your case to trial while you sit in jail for a year on the misdemeanor charge.

It was after the scam was developed, that Lawrence Rabb emailed John Doe and threatened him with a harassment charge if he communicated with him again.  Rabb took John Doe to the back and tried to execute on the scam. 

Gabby Garcia ordered John Doe to communicate with Rabb.  John Doe asked for an appointment to go over the case.  Rabb said no in writing and threatened him with harassment. 

According to Gabby Garcia this is John Doe refusing to cooperate.

NOTHING BUT CHOICE PREVENTS RABB AND SOROLA FROM FILING A MOTION TO QUASH THE INDICTMENT

Do not forget the Magistrate Judge dismissed the case for lack of probable cause.  There is no admissible evidence of anything.

The allegations by the sheriff's deputies do not match the indictment.  There is no crime. We will see if the new sheriff will address this matter.  

GABBY GARCIA IS USING YOUR TAX DOLLARS TO PAY 4 COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEYS TO DEFEND HER CONDUCT AND THAT OF DA SAENZ 

The husband-and-wife team of Lawrence Rabb and Korina Barraza were appointed without using Pretrial Release.  Pretrial release knows what happened and along with Ben Uresti are okay with the taxpayers being defrauded.

Does Lawrence Rabb need his wife to oversee his work and correct it?  No.  It is a con on the taxpayers to protect Gabby Garcia and Louis Sorola.

How does this one case need Albert Rodriguez, Louis Sorola, Rabb and Barraza as counsel?  The case was dismissed by the Magistrate Judge for want of probable cause. There is a material eyewitness there was no crime.