WOW, A VERY ROUGH DAY.  NOTHING COULD STOP THE PAIN UNTIL I PASSED OUT

I got about half of what I needed too.  The key is, I did what I needed to stop Gabriela Garcia, Bañales, and Chiuminatto as judges.  Regional Administrative Judge Missay Medary is being asked to intervene such as she did in the Elia Cornejo case.  She can do nothing and then explain why a federal judge had to act.

I do not know Judge Medary.  I think she may have mixed feelings about me.  Sources keep on telling me she forced out the CPS judge based on my evidence and formal request for an investigation. I just 

have no proof of this.  

I am not a stickler for how things are done so long as they are done pursuant to the rules. I would have preferred a report on my official complaint.  But the rules were followed for another path to solve the problem, and in the end the CPS case I was working on worked out best for the mother and younger children, before the formal dismissal. 

I do not care which path Judge Medary takes so long as it follows a valid set of rules, and the result is to end the case of John Doe.

It will not end for sure for Judge Chuiminatto. As a visiting judge the commission can more readily suspend his judicial credentials.  It is harder on a sitting judge who has been duly elected.  It happens when the conduct is sufficiently dangerous to the administration of justice.  The public reprimands I have found more than provide for the suspension of judicial credentials for both Chiuminatto, and Gabriela Garcia.  

I also found the legal foundation so justify Judge Medary to order the production of the reporter's record wherein Chiuminatto ordered me to sit down while yelling, and then while yelling "I bet he heard that." He knew I am a disabled vet and was deaf.  The federal civil rights complaint is done.  The question is will Judge Medary protect him and chance being humiliated with a federal ruling?  

She has a clear legal pathway to end this.  Of course, Saenz can do the right thing and just dismiss the case in the interest of justice based on Chiuminatto's conduct.

I think she will find a method within the law, to remove Chuiminatto from the case. 

Saenz of course can dismiss the criminal charges in the interest of justice based on Chuiminatto's conduct. I then move on to NC.

I am discussing the best path to pursue the complaint concerning Chiuminatto's decision to order John Doe to only speak English.

Immunity may fall in his case.  Because there are various ways to remove his judicial credentials, a court may find he is the exception to the rule on immunity. 

In the case of Godfrey Garza Jr., the court of appeals reversed Chiuminatto and ruled in favor of the original plaintiff.  This was a key case in the construction of the boarder wall, and alleged kick-backs to Godfrey Garza Jr.  Chiuminatto cleared Garza, but the court of appeals reversed him.

So I am going to try and sleep, then have my driver take me to McAllen early.  I would rather sit at the doctor's office than in my home.  He may take me early. 

WHAT I FORGOT

 Okay first, while finalizing all the documents for the mass press release, I notice Laura Perez-Reyes is at it again. She removed the initial lawsuit against Kathryn Roberts.  It was non-suited with clear allegations how her staff intentionally filed it in the wrong court.  It clearly said County Court at Law.  So too did the affidavit of indigence.

Laura Perez-Reyes cannot remove a record of a lawsuit.  I have printed the search which shows the lawsuit filed in the county court at law, but the district court one filed in Gabby Garcia's court has been removed.

ESTELA CHAVEZ-VASQUEZ I AM DONE

I am here in horrific pain unable to sleep because of Estela, in part.  If you remember I missed the follow-up appointment on my second sinus surgery.  The end result was the infection spreading to the inner ear bone, resulting in my near total loss of hearing.

LET THERE BE NO MISTAKE I WILL BE SUING GABBY GARCIA AND ESTELA CHAVEZ FOR VIOLATION OF MY ADA RIGHTS

In Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509 (2004), the Court found Congress waived immunity for violations of the ADA to include the courts.  The majority of Attorney Generals wrote in favor of no immunity. But Greg Abbott, then our AG wrote congress did not waive immunity.  Of note in the Lane decision the Court opened the door to whether 11th Amendment immunity decisions are wrong when dealing with a citizen of the state suing its own state.

For now, I have lost most of my hearing because of these two.

Louis Sorola in addition to my defamation suit will be part of the ADA case. It is coming Louis. 

Estela Chavez and or her staff engaged in an ex parte with Sorola, perhaps through his staff, and appeared at the hearing wherein I should have been with my surgeon.  As we got there his paralegal came out and gave me a reset. We complained the setting of that day interfered with my appointment with my surgeon.  Estela forced me to cancel that appointment, which has now led to the loss of my hearing.

Estela knows full well, I am the only voice for the defendant and Sorola was fired when the defendant filed his notice of self-representation. 

In the previous two status hearings, Estela very short on knowledge of the law said not a word about Sorola not being in the court, and had the defendant give the status. In every other case, she tells the defendants to go find their attorney. She did not do same for John Doe.  Why does Sorola have such privilege in Estela's court?

Estela Chavez knows in order for the defendant to appear at the next hearing I must cancel my appointment with my surgeon who is going to address my loss of hearing, and general infection.

Louis Sorola "my client has no right to a translator when testifying in a criminal case."  He can dispute me on this, but why did he remain silent when the judge ordered his client to not answer in Spanish. 

Louis Sorola "I have no duty to object or report a judge who mocks a hearing disabled veteran, who has been called as a witness." 

I figure it will take two weeks for the press to review the evidence in this case.

Forget the defendant: the issues are the right to self-representation.  Denial of representation of a competent attorney who is not attacking you in court.  The right to the court transcript for use at the trial level.  The state has found the defendant must file an affidavit of indigence with the court of appeals in order to get a copy of the trial transcript for use at the trial level.  No such rule exists so the Commission and Kathryn Roberts will be sued in Austin. Indigence has already been established at the trial level.

The 15th Court of Appeals will decide the equal protection issue. In civil cases a party may object to a visiting judge but not in criminal cases.  The rule is just made up by judges.  There is no legislative support for the rule. 

The 15th court of appeals will decide if Gabby Garcia violated the constitution when she appointed the husband-and-wife team of Lawrence Rabb, and Korina by bypassing the random wheel.  That made 4 attorneys for one case.

Texas never imagined that because of the creation of the 15th Court of Appeals there must now be dueling mandamuses before the 13th and 15th Court of Appeals. What a mess Saenz, Gabby Garcia and Estela Chavez-Vasquez have made of this case.

When Gilberto Hinojosa orders the wrongful prosecution of an innocent man, he gets it no matter the cost to the credibility of the state.

There are so many constitutional violations in this case, everyone will be caught up in this for 5-10 years, and Saenz will be long gone.