IS GARZA RUNNING AFTER FIRST KISSING GILBERTO HINOJOSA'S RING, OR IN DEFIANCE OF GILBERTO HINOJOSA'S DECISION TO RUN CHUY GARCIA?

I will not be there tonight.  Those who show will tell the story of whether Noe Garza is running with the consent of Luis Saenz and Gilberto Hinojosa.  If he is, it is certainly the end of Chuy Garcia's campaign.  If he is not, it opens the door of a war of words against Saenz and Hinojosa.

We wait and see if Mario Saenz shows up with his bullhorn pushing Garza or Garcia.

Trey Martinez failed to file a timely response to John Doe's Petition for Review with the Texas Supreme Court.  Out of respect for the Court, Trey should have filed a waiver to file a response.  

He certainly knows the rule provides for the Texas Supreme Court to give Trey Martinez a second chance to oppose the Petition for Review.  As a matter of policy, they will not proceed without informing Trey Martinez they intend to proceed and providing him a second chance to oppose the Petition for Review.  My issue is the lack of respect Trey has for the Court by not filing a waiver subject to any further action by the Court.

The John Doe civil case is important because it asks the Court to address the issue of how to evict § 8 tenants.  There is no issue, federal CFR's govern the proceedings.  There is no issue Chuy Garcia was not concerned with whether Come Build Come Dream alleged a basis for eviction under the CFR's. 

I am very close to suing for John Doe in federal court over these issues.  I have kept the COB out of the mess because it compounds the case.  This morning City Attorney Will Treviño made clear he wants the federal lawsuit over Housing not following the rules.  See Second post. 

REMOVAL ACTIONS

Here are the elected official subject to a removal action.

Sec. 87.012.  OFFICERS SUBJECT TO REMOVAL.  The district judge may, under this subchapter, remove from office:
(1)  a district attorney;
(2)  a county attorney;
(3)  a county judge;
(4)  a county commissioner;
(5)  a county clerk;
(6)  a district clerk;
(7)  a district and county clerk;
(8)  a county treasurer;
(9)  a sheriff;
(10)  a county surveyor;
(11)  a county tax assessor-collector;
(12)  a constable;
(13)  a justice of the peace;
(14)  a member of the board of trustees of an independent school district; and
(15)  a county officer, not otherwise named by this section, whose office is created under the constitution or other law of this state.

Note 13, JP.  Also note DA, County Attorney, district clerk, Sheriff.  Sheriff Treviño is being given his last chance to end the abuses by Adult Probation before facing a removal action.  There is no issue they are in a criminal enterprise against John Doe.

There is no issue Chuy Garcia is running an illegal campaign for the 107th Judicial District Clerk, with the help of Mario Saenz. Anyone can file the removal action against Chuy Garcia. He will deny the claim he is running for the 107th.  Then on January 1, 2026, announce he is running. This will be the equivalent of hanging himself.  Any voter in Cameron County can file the removal action. 

Rumors are not facts.  This is why it is important we carefully watch who shows up at the Noe Garza campaign kick-off.

A removal action against Linda Salazar, Cyndi Hinojosa, Mary Esther Sorola, and Chuy Garcia is coming.  I have the solid proof they conspired with Gilberto Hinojosa to deny John Doe justice in his eviction case.  He was never evicted.  They just corrupted the process.  They failed to follow the law concerning how cases are moved around between JPs.  

The Brownsville Housing Authority refused to enforce the law as to how a Section 8 tenant is evicted.  Will Trevino, Brownsville City attorney had the chance to end any claims against Housing.  This morning, he chose to proceed in defending the city.