CHIEF JUSTICE JAIME TIJERINA OF THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS TO BE SUED FOR HIS ACTIONS UNDER HIS ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES, AND A REQUEST HE BE SUSPENDED FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR AUTHORIZING EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT

CLERK OF THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS KATHY S. MILLS TO BE SUED FOR CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY TO PROMOTE EX PARTE COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE COURT, AND FALSIFYING CLAIMS OF CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS BEING ASKED TO RESPOND TO THE COURT'S CONCERNS

Here is the deal, the State Bar of Texas cannot control my actions, but I can still get paid $200.00 plus an hour for my work.  Why would any intelligent person allow themselves to be controlled by a criminal enterprise such as the Star Bar?

My days are mostly spend doing endless research and tying documents together.

One cannot charge Kathy S. Mills for the unauthorized practice of law because she is a lawyer.  The evidence I have against her will be put before the State Bar.  The State Bar knows my mega lawsuit for acting as a criminal enterprise to protect the likes of Kathy S. Mills, is forthcoming.  I have more than enough denied valid complaints against attorneys dismissed as an inquiry to justify my claims. 

So here is the deal, when Lawrence Rabb filed his emotionally bankrupt motion with the court to withdraw, Kathy S. Mills issued a ruling for the court that only Lawrence Rabb could respond for John Doe.  This is how diluted her mind is.  No one can argue it is within her duties as a Clerk to issue legal rulings binding with the court.  She got caught and knows it, which is why after the initial bizarre letter, she dropped the case law.  The case law made it an opinion, and not the act of a recalcitrant clerk.

The fact she is recognized for teaching civility in the courts speaks volumes how little the courts care about civility.  Like so much of the corrupt judiciary she seems to think punishing anyone who complains about judicial corruption should be punished.

John Does' case is black and white.  A material witness, and only witness said there was no gun.  All the defense attorneys made no effort to secure the admissible testimony of the only witness. 

In the sister civil case, it has now been formally presented to the Texas Supreme Court for review.  Mind you, I do not care if it is the Supreme Court or Texas Supreme Court, the merit of a claim is never on the table.  The primary question is, will a resolution of the case help judges.  Then there are the political cases, ala Trump.  There was a time, the Courts would not take political cases.  The Republicans abandoned that Rule to ensure Trump could take control of the government.

I have no idea if the Texas Supreme Court will take the case.  But I do know it has merit and an opinion will impact JP courts throughout the state.  But I never try to guess what the Texas Supreme Court will do. 

IN THE CRIMINAL CASES

Once I get the largest of the complaints filed with the FBI, and if need be take them to Washington, I will ask that John Doe's email system be checked for any evidence of two emails Kathy S. Mills claims to have sent to John Doe.  They are not there.  The FBI can do a forensic exam to try and find them. A federal judge can order her to produce same.

You see in the misdemeanor case Kathy S. Mills claims to have warned John Doe his appeal would be dismissed if he did not prove an appealable issue.  It never happened.  In fact, I can prove she never informed John Doe the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal. This is the case where Laura Betancourt found John Doe was convicted in the felony case. All false.

Kathy S. Mills issued an illegal order from the court stating only Lawrence Rabb could file a Motion to Recuse the Court for conspiring with Lawrence Rabb.  This is how truly diluted her mind is and the extent of her contempt for our Constitution.

So now we face an issue she will reject John Doe's response to Adam Neece's motion to withdraw. She will issue the standard letter only Neece can file a response for John Doe.  

I am convinced Sheriff Manny Treviño has asked AG Paxton to get involved.  The state does not want this nightmare.

Kathy S. Mills will be in federal court for the remainder of her legal career before the court.  She will be defending the indefensible when her term as the Clerk comes up for renewal. 

My time is best managed in keeping all the complaints going.

Kathy S. Mills needs to be disbarred and sent to federal prison.  She knows what she has done.  

This is what Saenz wanted. 

TO BE CLEAR ON ADAM NEECE- HE IS A LIAR

John Doe did not fire him as he claimed to the Court of Appeals.  We met at his request with me being invited in writing.  We can prove this.  I brought enough documents to prove appealable issues.  He agreed the case was good for appeal.

I demanded he seek rehearing on two motions which were held ex parte without notice to John Doe.  The first was Lawrence Rabb's motion to withdraw.  Gabby Garcia who at this point is showing emotional desperation allowed Rabb to trash his client with no opportunity to respond.  There is actually no entry of there ever being a hearing, although that is what Gabby Garcia claims in her order.

Adam Neece was then appointed at this hearing, which he knew was ex parte.  Adam Neece was asked to seek a rehearing based on the ex parte nature of the hearing.  He had a clear financial interest in not seeking to have the order voided.  Adam Neece is no more honest than his corrupt father.  Ben Neece was always front and center when it came to local corruption.

The other order he refused to seek a rehearing on was the sanction order against John Doe.  There is no issue, again Irma Gilman gave no notice of the hearing to John Doe. The judge set the hearing on 2 days' notice although the law requires three days.  John Doe was sanctioned for failure to appear at a hearing Irma Gilman and Gabby Garcia hid from him and was not properly notice.  he was never warned of sanctions.

Both of these hearings were post judgment, which mean they are appealable.  Adam Neece cared more about billing the county which is why he tried to keep the case.  The emails will show we agreed to allow him to remain on the case once the order was voided.  

At no time did John Doe fire him as he claims.  John Doe demanded I be with him to review the appellate record.  The record belongs to John Doe, not Adam Neece.

Adam Neece in writing invited me to be part of the process and then went hostile after the first meeting.

Adam Neece is going to find out how expensive it can be to use me to cover up his corruption.  We honestly thought Adam was going to help.  After the first meeting his attitude changed.  John Doe's father was there.  He was as shocked as I was when Adam changed his attitude.

All John Doe told Adam Neece is he would not meet with him unless I was there to help.  It was Adam Neece who refused to meet with John Doe and then lied by saying he was fired.  He was not.  He quit. 

This is best handled by an independent attorney and judge to hash out the facts based on documents and testimony and not by the court of appeals in a he said she said briefing war. 

I WILL BE BUSY IN THE MORNING - I MAY HAVE COVID AND NEED TO GO TO THE VA

I have really intense chills.  Apparently, people who are fully vaccinated can have Covid without fever, but chills. There is someone I am in contact on a regular basis who may have Covid.

I will try and complete the response to the court of appeals claiming Adam Neece is a liar.  I must say Lawrence Rabb amended his motion when he realized bringing me into it to bias the court was a mistake.  Adam Neece alleges nothing to show John Doe's wishes are without merit.  His argument is because I am helping John Doe he should be punished.

Hopefully Adam is keeping his nursing license because practicing criminal law will become impossible once the federal lawsuit is filed.