IT IS WITH PURPOSE AND FAITH, I AWAIT THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT TO RULE

Thursdays are a day of anxiety.  Every Friday, the Texas Supreme Court issues its general orders.  It is most likely my mandamus will be decided in the Friday orders, and not a midweek ruling.

Most practitioners of mandamus filings fail to understand there are two forms of mandamus.  One involves an irreparable injury.   The other is as a matter of law, regardless of irreparable injury.

Mandamus practitioners make the mistake of asking the court for a stay in a case of as a matter of law.  In my case, the assigned trial judge, automatically stayed everything.  It is called deference to the court. 

You do not rush the court by asking for a needless stay.  These are the midweek orders denying the mandamus.  

So, the way I handled the mandamus, the Texas Supreme Court can take all the time it wants to decide it.  

But this creates the anxiety I experience knowing once the Friday orders are released, my request may be denied.

I cannot predict what they will do.  I know facts and law are manipulated to the result they want.  When reviewed most decisions can be taken apart to show they are contrived to get to a result.  This is why the result cannot be predicted.

Like I said before, I maneuver around the flanks, But I also know this can make the court angry. 

LAURA PEREZ-REYES

The request she produce the record remains before the 13th Court of Appeals.  Let there be no mistake, she will face a criminal complaint for obstruction of justice. If the court of appeals denies the Motion for Rehearing because there is no reference to the record, it will be on Laura Perez-Reyez

ADULT PROBATION

I can assure you the VA is not happy. I missed my appointment with my brain surgeon. The VA and dental school are angry I missed my 8:30 a.m. appointment this morning with the oral surgeon.  In an attempt for some relief, the VA is trying to find an ENT doctor who will remove the tubes in my ears which forms part of the problem. They are seeking emergency care.  Like tomorrow.

If the court of appeals agrees the criminal case against John Doe should be dismissed because there is no charging instrument it will cost the probationer officer, her job.  She clearly said in writing she was going to change the November 13th appointment because I would be in San Antonio with the doctor.  We could have still done it electronically which is how it was initially set. 

But after she told John Doe in writing she would change the date, she in fact changed it from online to in person.  She knew it meant me having to cancel my appointments in San Antonio,

I will be with John Doe today.  We will turn over certain medical records, which show the care he is receiving.  He likes his doctor and the care he is receiving. 

We are moving forward, and Adult Probation will see no rest as this moves through the courts.  The retaliation is even obvious to the blind.