TEXAS SUPREME COURT WITH 10 A.M. ORDERS COULD DECIDE MY MANDAMUS AGAINST ART MCDONALD

UPDATE:

At 9:20 a.m., my phone rang waking me up.  The caller wanted my reaction to the Supreme Court's decision TO NOT revisit the Marriage Equality case.  I said, they are picking their fights, and this is a fight they do not want.  They are using their political capital to insure Trump can reshape this county on more important issues.

HOW THIS RELATES TO ART MCDONALD

If by the end of the week the Texas Supreme Court does not rule on my Motion to Recuse them based on an undisputed fact an LGBTQ+ person cannot get a fair hearing before the court because 8 of  the Justices added a comment to Canon 4, that based on religious objection they can refuse to perform ANY marriage they find objectionable. 

This morning the Supreme Court made clear in refusing the Kim Davis decision, sincerely held religious beliefs is not a basis to deny LGBTQ+ equality.

It is so bizarre in the comment they overruled Loving v. Virginia, interracial marriage, and the Marriage Equality case.

So what will happen in the Art McDonald case is, I will move the discrimination part of the case to federal case, which will effectively put into question every case I am involved with.

THE SIDE ISSUE:

 The main defendant in my case is Texas Lone Star AC. The owner signed a consent decree he violated the codes.  He is paying $11,250 to the state as a penalty for his actions.

The owner too has no rights.  He has no representation.  His bonding company, Contractors Bonding and Insurance Company is in court not only in the owners name denying the state sanctions, but also demanding I be sanctioned for bringing the state complaint and Motion to Enforce the consent decree.

The state can take his license because of my Motion to Enforce.  They can order he pay upwards of $350,000 for the loss value to my home.  In the case law by the Texas Supreme Court, I have no right to try and fix this mess with him directly.  I am expect to file my Motion to Enforce against the owner of Texas Lone Star AC.  

The owner of Texas Lone Star needs to hire an attorney now to sue the bonding company and the lawyer the bonding company hired to defend him.  This is his only defense against the Motion to Enforce.  He has to clearly allege the lawyer and the bonding company conspired against him.  I have the email from the lawyer he represents the interests of the bonding company.  I demanded a signed waiver of conflict of interest signed by the owner of Texas Lone Star AC, and the lawyer refused, because he does not have one.

ORIGINAL POST

It is expected that at 10 p.m., Monday the Supreme Court will indicate if it intends to revisit marriage equality.  It is extraordinary the Texas Supreme Court assumed the Supreme Court will reverse itself on marriage equality.  Just extraordinary

Because the then 8 sitting justices added a comment to Canon 4, that refusing to perform any marriage based on religious objections, they by their act indicated they believe discrimination based on sexual orientation is permissible. 

I am seeking recusal of all the Justices unless they aver in writing they do not have religious beliefs against marriage equality.  It goes beyond that and raises the specter they as a judge cannot be fair with any LGBTQ+ party before the court.  

Actually the way the comment is written a judge can refuse to do an interracial marriage based on religious objections.  This is a reversal to the 1967,  ruling in Loving v. Virginia.

As I have already established, marriage is strictly a matter of civil contract.  The authority to not oversee a civil contract based on your religious believes makes a mockery of all our laws.