IT'S OFFICIAL, TEXAS SUPREME COURT WILL DECIDE IF THEY HAVE TO RECUSE THEMSELVES IN MY CASE AGAINST SOROLA, BASED ON THE FILE MARKED COPY OF MY MOTION TO HOLD THEM IN CONTEMPT FOR INTERFERENCE WITH MY FEDERAL CASE BEFORE JUDGE ROLANDO OLVERA

I got the case before the Texas Supreme Court because Regional Administrative Judge Missay Medary in December 2025, assigned Judge Oscar Hale to replace Judge David Gonzales III.  The problem is, Judge Gonzales did not recuse himself until January 2026. Her order is void for a want of jurisdiction.  Her jurisdiction was not invoked thereby voiding any order she signed in the case. 

The Supreme Court must decide if my contempt motion before Judge Olvera raises a question of impartiality. There is also the issue since they did not have any jurisdiction to sign the three subject orders, they lose their immunity and I can sue them in federal court in Austin.  I can also sue Missy Medary because in the Sorola case she lacked any jurisdiction to assign Oscar Hale.

The problem the Texas Supreme Court faces is Judge Olvera can rule against them.  Assuming the case goes to Orlando Garcia in Austin, he can find no immunity. Finally Associate Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, as the Circuit Justice can void their three orders.  

As to the Supreme Court, next week I hope to file my Motion for Stay to the Texas Supreme Court Pending my Petition for Writ of Mandamus with the Supreme Court.  It is jurisdictional and if the Clerk of the Texas Supreme Court refuses to file it, it will only further anger the US Supreme Court. The mandamus is directed to the Texas Supreme Court and not Texas Lone Star AC.

It will take three federal judges to reject the issue before we are done.  Conflicting rulings will only make a mess of it.

An Application for Stay to the US Supreme Court is not a Petition for Writ of Certiorari.  Because I will keep it to 13 pages Justice Alito will actually read it before he rejects it or refers it to the entire Court.  It will be extraordinary if the Supreme Court does not act to protect the jurisdiction of the federal courts. 

Now the Texas Supreme Court can grant my stay and void the three orders, which will leave the US Supreme Court less interested in hearing the case.  But it will not change the fact they will have to recuse themselves and ask the Governor to Appoint interim Justices to hear my case.

Simply voiding Judge Missy Medary's order and then assigning a Judge to do her job, will send a message the case against Sorola will go forward.  No judge is going to play the distraction game.  It will be ruled on the merits and the defamation per se is solid. I believe once it goes forward, I will win on liability leaving the damages to a jury.

If the press picks up on my Application for Stay to Justice Alito, it will expose the Texas Supreme Court and Court of Criminal Appeals. The truth will come out.  

I gave Sorola a reasonable settlement offer. He has rejected it.  If you know me, I always make settlement an option.  But Sorola wants to be the hero and take me down.  It will not happen.  No Judge at this point will play along with him.

As to the Texas Supreme Court, I have a large settlement package before the court.  The first two items do not involve a penny, and they are the most important.  If I can get the first one involving my brother in the press, the Texas Supreme Court will be toast, and former Chief Justice Nathan Hecht will have his reputation destroyed. 

I have put a very reasonable settlement offer on the table.  I agreed to confidentiality.  I have made clear even if I get this into the press, I will not allow the case to be used to help the Democrats.  No Democrat running for statewide office is qualified.  I want reform, not substitute unqualified elected officials.

If this blows up into the statewide press or even better national, Luis Saenz and Gabby Garcia will see the end of their careers. Their removal is part of any settlement.