CAMERON COUNTY JUDICIAL SYSTEM GOES INTO NUCLEAR MELTDOWN

In a million years I never could have predicted what happened today.  But the Cameron County Democrats are devoid of any sense of honor or justice.

The first of several lawsuits filed today was clearly marked for the county court at law courts.  That did not stop Laura Perez-Reyes staff from assigning the case to Gabby Garcia in the 138th District Court.

The clerk working on the case disappeared for maybe 10 minutes and then finished marking the lawsuit.  I did not look at it until I got home and saw what she did.

The clerk actually assigned the case involving the 138th District Court to Gabby Garcia a district court judge while refusing to assign the case to a county court at law judge as requested.

First, she refuses to post the release of Albert Rodriguez from the case, then she refuses to post Judge Banales' notice of hearing on the Motion to Recuse Judge Garcia, then she posts Jesus "Chuy" Garcia will hear the recusal of Judge Banales, and finally she assigns the lawsuit against the Kathryn Roberts to Judge Garcia.  If she is subject to a removal action, I think we are there. There is clearly a section 1983.

Also, indigent criminal defendants are entitled to free service of subpoenas, Laura Perez-Reyes has refused to have subpoenas served. 

I just learned the clerk misspelled John Does' name on the lawsuit filed yesterday, so unless you have the cause number you cannot find it.

AGAIN, THE BACKGROUND ON THIS CASE

The case was dismissed by the magistrate judge for want of probable cause.  There is an eyewitness who says there was no gun.  All they have is a 911 call claiming gunshots were heard. 

In the felony case John Doe has 4 court appointed attorneys at your expense. It includes the husband-and-wife team of Lawrence Rabb and Korina Barraza.  As I have already posted, in an email after John Doe requested an appointment to go over the case, Lawrence Rabb threatened his client with harassment.  According to Gabby Garcia this is proper conduct by a defense attorney.

Not one of the 4 court appointed attorney have sought out the eyewitness statement.  They claim they cannot work with John Doe, but go to court claiming to be his attorney although John Doe has asserted his right to self-representation.  

They have the documents, and it is by choice they choose to not file the motion to dismiss. John Doe does not need to sign off on it.

In fact, John Doe has filed a motion to dismiss and not one of the 4 attorneys have asked for a hearing on same. Why?

Gilberto Hinojosa is the head of the snake in retaliation against me for my work against him and his wife.  It all goes back to Come Build Come Dream, and Cyndi Hinojosa's service on the Board.

Louis Sorola abandoned his client on day one.  He did not meet with his client as ordered by the court.  He showed up and recommended a $10,000 bond on his client and said nothing about the magistrate judge dismissing the case, then left the courtroom.  I had to post the bail.

Then for months Sorola did nothing to contact John Doe.

John Doe rejected the appointment of Louis Sorola because Sorola paid Montoya to attack his family and defend Gabby Garcia.  Gabby Garcia made it clear this is acceptable.

Then comes the hearing wherein Sorola attacked his client with help of Gabby Garcia. 

Sorola on the record:

" MR. SOROLA: Yes, I have discovery but my client -- now that he's questioning my voracity I would like to file all of the emails he sent me with the Court -- and his uncle's, too. I've been threatened with legal action, I've been threatened with Federal Court, being turned over to the FBI. I mean, I would like to file all of that now that my voracity has been questioned, Judge"

For the record I have no relationship to John Doe.  Sorola loves to call the people I help my family.  It is just a lie.  A lie he has paid Montoya to print.

Sorola demand Judge Garcia depose John Doe as to his complaint to the state her court reporter is now facing 3 complaints for refusing to provide a free transcript to John Doe,

" MR. SOROLA: There's an attachment to the mandamus that has been filed. And there's quite a few emails, Judge. 

 THE COURT: Mr. John Doe, you are objecting to Mrs. Roberts to being the court reporter because your right was violated? Is that what you're stating in this email 

... .

 So why do you need a court record? I take it by your silence that you do not have an answer for me; is that correct? 

THE DEFENDANT: Not at the moment. 

 THE COURT: Did you need a court record from Mrs. Roberts, Mr. Sorola? MR. SOROLA: No, Judge. We haven't -- I haven't been able to do anything. I do have discovery. I've looked at the case."

So, what you have here is Gabby Garcia at Louis Sorola's request deposing John Doe to create a record which they believe will protect Gabby's court reporter.

What the record shows is clear bias by Gabby Garcia and Louis Sorola.  John Doe has the right to defend himself against this conduct.

Does anyone think Sorola is going to demand a record which shows he is working for the DA and against his client.  I would be shocked if Sorola has any appellate record or knows how to preserve error.