GABBY GARCIA, "SUBBORNING FELONY PERJURY IS HOW I SUPRESS MY CRIMINAL CONDUCT."

What I am about to post just came from Gabby Garcia's court reporter, Kathryn Roberts.  Now I had it because I paid for it, it just expedited my final draft of the federal lawsuit and mandamus.

Saenz, Pete Gilman, and Gabby Garcia are not very smart.  A plea bargain is a contract.  A contract based in felony perjury is void, hence subject to a mandamus.  Because they fail to understand the plea is a contract, they are unaware the rules of contract apply.

I have never met a contract I could not void, or break.  Why? because law schools do not teach the art of drafting an iron clad contract.  In fact, my first Supreme Court win came from my work as a clerk, from a high-profile Boutique law firm. See, Pollack

McFarland, my legal mentor, forced me to begin with the corporate books of his many clients.  I loved the Arby's case because Judge Black accused me of manipulating Arby's into a trademark injunction. We were hired after the fact.  Judge Black is the one who allowed for an ex parte injunction.  

A franchise agreement is a contract.  It is governed by state law.  What I am explaining to you is what you learn in law school during the first month when you do not attend the worse law school in Texas. Contract is state law, not federal.  As an out of state corporation, you cannot do business in Texas unless you are properly register with Texas.  Arby's allowed their authorization to lapse so they had no legal authority to bring a contract case in Texas.  Hence, they could not seek an injunction based in contract.  The $150,000.00 bond was paid to our client, and Judge Black blamed me. 

 In the Pollack case my boss and I argued about whether Rule 11 applied in the case. The Supreme Court agreed with me, not him.  We won the right to have our client's claim heard because the so-called settlement was not done properly.  I will never forget the day in federal court when Hilda Tagle accused me of misrepresenting the decision and then really doubled down on me when I explained to her, I had written the prevailing brief.

THE FELONY PERJURY SUBBORN BY GABBY GARCIA

Gabby Garcia puts into the record John Doe has a history of mental health issues and is in fact under the care of doctors at New Horizon. 

 "MS. BARRAZA: Your Honor, then at this point, Your Honor, we're respectfully asking for a psychological evaluation.

 THE COURT: Ordered. MS. BARRAZA: Thank you, Your Honor. We'll submit an order to the Court.

 THE COURT: Okay. Submit the proper motion, as well. State? MR. LOZANO: Yes, Judge? 

 THE COURT: They will be filing a motion for an evaluation of Mr. John Doe. 

 MR. LOZANO: We have no objection to that."

They compelled John Doe to sign an affidavit denying what he had already put into the record.  His previous sworn testimony made clear his history of mental illness, and the names of his live doctors.

Everyone in that courtroom new the truth and they abused a mentally ill defendant who on the record swore he could not read or write.

GABBY WAS NOT HAPPY WITH THE FACT SHE HAD JOHN DOE COMMIT FELONY PERJERY - SHE CERTIFIED SHE FOUND HIM TO BE MENTALLY COMPETENT

Gabby hung herself.  John Gonzalez, defense counsel for Kathryn Roberts, tossed her under the bus by refusing the information on the name of the court reporter who took down the plea.  Juan Gonzalez askes we only communicate with him.  Now he is forcing the court of appeals to order Kathryn Roberts to disclose who acted in her stead.  Every county employee I have ever spoken with who was under the delusion Juan Gonzalez was protecting them has told me the same thing.  He never protects the county employee's interest.  Kathryn Roberts was warned about this, and now she will learn the hard way. 

THEIR ONLY DEFENSE AT THIS TIME 

Their only defense is "dismissed in the interest of justice."  They can then explain later it was an "innocent mistake."  But holding on to the perjury leaves them with no defense.