Two days ago, the dishonorable Laura Betancourt caused me to miss my antibiotic infusion therapy by holding John Doe in court until 11:15 a.m. I got lucky and my doctor's staff agreed to a late session. On Tuesday afternoon I will learn if I am done or another 5 weeks, or possibly surgery.
SO, WHAT DID LAURA DO?
In court she told John Doe the prescription drug case had been dismissed, and he was free to go. She asked the DA if some order had been signed and someone said yes. Here is the problem. Jacqueline Morals, one of DA Saenz trained monkeys who has zero regard for the law, filed a motion to dismiss the prescription drug case, without any notice or opportunity to respond to John Doe. This procedure she would have learned the first day of law school, so I am assuming she missed the first day of law school.
You cannot represent someone has been convicted of a felony offense without giving them an opportunity to defend against the claim. But that is what this inept UT law school graduate did. She cannot claim ignorance based on having graduated one of the absolute worse law schools not only in Texas, but also the entire country, such as Gabby Garcia, and Chuy Garcia - for the record both are enslaved to Gilberto Hinojosa. So, we must conclude that Jaqueline Morales acted with specific intent to falsify a document filed with the court.
She stated John Doe was convicted of the felony gun charge so therefore the misdemeanor case should be dismissed. There is zero evidence of a conviction in the felony case. In fact, the case remains pending. So why did Jaqueline Morales lie? She was told to by Saenz. The State Bar complaint is done along with the documents. I am asking for an immediately suspension of her license. Saenz will have no problem watching he career come to a crashing end. Such as all ADAs who work for Saenz, she is disposable.
Laura Betancourt devoid of even an interest in following the law says in the order of dismissal she viewed the order of conviction in the felony case and concluded the dismissal should be granted.
It takes an extraordinarily corrupt judge to issue an order of conviction for a criminal defendant who is not before her court in the felony case. I have no idea how this happens. But I have the documents. I got them after I made clear I would no longer tolerate Sylvia Garza-Perez's contempt for the law. Sylvia is demanding a federal judge explain due process to her. How sad and pathetic that she believes Gilberto Hinojosa can protect her.
Anyone who looks to Gilberto Hinojosa for protection is unfit to be an elected official. This race is on. We need a highly qualified Republican to take on Sylvia on the merits.
No comments:
Post a Comment