SAENZ ORDERS PETER GILMAN TO FORCE TWO SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES TO MISLEAD JURY
You have to understand the context of the John Doe case. The magistrate judge dismissed the charges for lack of probable cause. I have been unable to find one attorney or judge who can remember Saenz prosecuting anyone after the magistrate dismissed the charges.
GILBERTO HINOJOSA IS THE HEAD OF THE SNAKE - HE IS THE SLIME BUCKET WORKING 24/7 TO PUT JESUS "CHUY" GARCIA IN BEN EURESTI'S PLACE - IT WILL NOT HAPPEN
Gilberto is down for the count and will never get up again.
We have the cams and witnesses, and no one has subpoenaed them for the trial. No one has filed a Motion to Quash, other than John Doe, which Gabby Garcia will not allow to be heard.
The eyewitness who we are told was allowed to disappear stated he saw John Doe and there was no gun. Peter Gilman knows this, but is so diluted of any sense of honor, does not care.
Both these officers stated under oath that John Doe stated he did not shoot a gun, and then after more bullying claims he said he shot into the ground. According to Bobby Lerma, and my research this is not a crime in the county. So why would Bobby Lerma not just put it to Peter Gilman he is going to quash the testimony or argue if taken as true it is not a crime. Answer, Gilman wants blood, and Lerma was not willing to protect John Doe.
Why would any honest lawyer tell his client there is no crime and then recommend he plead guilty to a felony gun charge, resulting in loss of all his federal benefits. Bobby Lerma will be before the State Bar for a long time, if he fails to handle this.
The actual charge has John Doe shooting at the apartments. On what evidence? They claim he said he shot into the ground after they bullied, but before he said he did not fire a gun.
Also, there is an alleged eyewitness who claims they saw John Doe picking something up off the ground. It was cigarette butts, but they implied it may have been casings. This would be consistent with shooting into the ground, and not at buildings.
Bobby Lerma promised a PTD on a misdemeanor charge. He claimed he might get Gilman to dismiss the original charge and refile under a misdemeanor. I have no problem with Gilman refusing the offer. My problem is Bobby claiming John Doe and I agreed to the felony charge. There is no crime. We never agreed to it.
Bobby should have said Gilman was not interested, and then should have pushed for the dismissal based on the officer's testimony and the unconstitutional search and seizure. It was his decision to blame us which got him into trouble. Simply saying no plea was possible would have been fine. He did his best. But no, he ran cover for Pete Gilman.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR: IF SHERIFF TREVINO DOES NOT INTERVENE TO STOP THIS, I WILL USE THIS POST AS NOTICE HE KNEW WHAT WAS HAPPENING
HE HAS AN EMAIL ASKING HE NOT ALLOW HIS DEPUTIES BE USED IN A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.
I WAS CLEAR THEY MUST RESPOND TO THE SUBPOENA, BUT THE SHERIFF'S OFFICE HAS A DUTY TO ENSURE HIS DEPUTIES ARE NOT BEING USED FOR A MALICIOUS PROSECUTION
Comment rejected: All I have done is tell the sheriff his deputies are being used for a malicious prosecution. They have to respond to a subpoena. But sheriff Trevino has a duty to ensure his officers are not being used for criminal malicious prosecution. Trevino is free to do nothing. But if he deputies aid in a criminal malicious prosecution, they can and will be held accountable. If Sheriff Trevino believes there was no stated crime, he can protect his deputies. I am not sure who would represent the sheriff's deputies, but if it is Juan Gonzalez with the county, they are screwed. This is not complex. Sheriff Trevino reviews everything and concludes his deputies are being used in good faith, he does nothing. In good faith I did everything I could to make this go away. Now the Dallas attorney will take control and Gabby Garcia will learn she is not Cameron county anymore where the criminal defense counsel would put their own child to the death needle is that is what is expected of them. The Democrats have so corrupted this county, law and order or justice is not an option. I get why Bobby Lerma took the blame. Peter Gilman would have punished him if Bobby told the truth that Peter wanted blood and was prepared to throw his wife, Irma under the bus. Which he did. The offer which is clearly detailed in a summary to Lerma was to give Saenz some justification for the prosecution, while leaving John Doe clean in terms of his federal benefits. I did not throw Bobby Lerma under the bus. We gave him total confidence. We gave Peter Gilman a clear message of trust to make this happen. If you believe John Doe after all of this agreed to plead guilty to a felony gun charge in exchange for Pretrial Diversion, which in writing Lerma was told John Doe could not afford if all fees were not waived, then you will believe anything? Bobby Lerma was forced to give us the details. Bobby did try in good faith to make this happen. Buy Peter Gilman refused to discuss a real plea. Then Bobby blamed us for changing our mind about pleading to the gun charge. So Bobby protected Peter Gilman, and now he wants to play the victim.
ReplyDelete