TEXAS SUPREME COURT OPENS DOOR TO NON-LAWYERS REPRESENTING INDIGENT PRO SE. 

The criminal case of John Doe has a sister civil case with the key issue being the right of the disabled party to designate an ADA advocate to speak for them in court.

The Texas Supreme Court granted time for John Doe to file his Petition for Review based on me, his ADA advocate, having been sick and needing time to finalize the Petition.

Key excerpt from the Motion, which was granted. "Petitioner’s is Pro Se, and disabled indigent on SSI. An issue in this case, and an issue the new Chief Justice has expressed interest in, is, must the courts recognize an American with Disabilities designated advocate who aides the disabled Petitioner in court. The revered Judge Posner in writing for the federal court of appeals found a petitioner can sue state courts for refusing to allow for the ADA advocate to aid in litigation.  See, in Reed v. State of Illinois, No.14-1745 (7th Cir Ct Appeals, 2015)"

"During this period leading up to today, Petitioner’s advocate spend 5 weeks in the hospital hooked up to a double IV for antibiotic resistance.  He then spent 9 weeks doing the same as an outpatient.  He then did 4 more weeks taking oral antibiotics ... ."

The court agreed to the extra 30 days based on me having been sick.  This is now the law as to John Doe.  It would be extraordinary for the 13th Court of Appeals to not accept a ruling which in effect reversed them in the civil case.

Based on the Ruling Judge Gabby Garcia has clearly repeatedly violated the law under the ADA.

Why I am confident we will win in the Texas Supreme Court, assuming I get things filed on time.  The same issues will be litigated in federal court in Austin.  AG Ken Paxton will know about the Petition before the Supreme Court.  In federal court he will rightfully ask for a stay pending a ruling from the Texas Supreme Court.  This will mean Paxton will chime in for the Texas Supreme Court to comply with federal law so as to make the federal lawsuit moot.

The criminal case never should have ever been brought.  Saenz can still get out of it by asking Judge Gabby Garcia to grant the Motion to Withdraw the Plea Bargain, and then dismissing both criminal cases in the interest of justice.

No one more than me wants to put all this folder aware for every - 10 year or so.  I can then get back to reading.  Right now, my primary interest is reading ancient history.  

I love my backyard swing bench especially when there is a Gulf breeze.  I take in the breeze while drinking a nice hot cup of coffee.

But I will meet Saenz move for move and he will lose, or we both close this case out.

Monday after a quick morning doctor's appointment I will ask the court of appeals to hold Gabby Garcia in contempt for non-compliance with their order and defrauding them by appointing Lawrence Rabb knowing full well Rabb and his wife's conduct are part of the appeal.

I am also seeking contempt of court against the adult probation officer assigned to this case. Someone in the county's legal department has told her she can go outside the terms set out by the court and then destroy drug test results. This is not the law.  The county will pay for their decision to join Saenz in this nightmare.  Pretrial release is also referenced in the civil RICO and § 1983 case, which is finally nearly complete. 

IF THE GRANTING OF ME TO PREPARE THE BRIEF HOLDS, IT WILL OPEN THE DOOR TO 1000'S OF DISABLED PERSONS BEING ABLE TO USE NON-LAWYERS TO ADVOCATE FOR THEM IN COURT

GILBERTO HINOJOSA AND TREY MARTINEZ TO OPPOSE THIS WIN FOR THE DISABLED

Gilberto Hinojosa has always been a self-serving nobody running under the Democratic label because it served his agenda.  I am confident as the day is long, when the time comes, I can prove Gilberto Hinojosa has been the head of the snake in this nightmare along with Luis Saenz.  Trey Martinez was hired to execute on the conspiracy. 

Come Dream Come Build could lose all its federal and state funding for arguing against the rights of disabled persons under the ADA.  They never expected it to get this far, but it has.  

None of the bad players could have imagined I would spend nearly three years of my life working for free to secure justice.  It is because these players as lawyers never took their oath seriously.

Gilberto Hinojosa is fine putting his wife in a position of defending his conduct while running for reelection as a JP.  Will Gilberto defend her in the removal action?  Yes, JP's like Cindi Hinojosa, Chuy Garcia, Mary Esther Sorola and Linda Salazar are all subject to removal under the statute.  

I can prove they conspired to ignore the law to give the civil case to Chuy Garcia, who agreed to do Gilberto Hinojosa's dirty work to settle the score with me after I went public about how Cindy, his wife took, contractor money for her JP campaign at the same time she was awarding contracts to contractors to build Casitas Lantana.

I can prove the law required JP Salazar to give the case to Cindy wherein she would have to reject it and then give it to Mary Esther Sorola, who would reject it to give it to Chuy Garcia.  The problem is, rather than go on record of rejecting the case, they just ignored the law and gave it to Chuy Garcia.

I can now prove Chuy Garcia is running an illegal campaign for the 197th Judicial District Court.  My case is solid. Chuy refused to resign as a JP first.  He will be telling the Commission on Judicial Conduct and Texas Ethics Commission my evidence is conclusory [laughing because I am not sure he knows that rule] to then have to explain how I was all wrong when he formally announces without having to first resign as a JP.  He actually believes they will find it a coincidence.

 Saenz and Hinojosa could have ended this a long time ago, but now it may be too late.