THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT IS FRANLIN. 

The founding fathers knew full well the people are the sovereigns, and not the government. The government sits subordinate to the people.  A question I am about to pose in federal court with this entire mess is, is adherence to your oath as a public official discretionary or mandatory.

I get the press will say this is stupid.  It is not.  If adherence to your oath of office as a public figure is discretionary, then what compels any elected official to uphold the constitution and laws.  This is what is wrong with the immunity doctrine. A subordinate employee of the people (sovereign) cannot be immune from suit by the sovereign.  There is no immunity and to the extent the courts have found same, it is based on a false belief the public figure is the sovereign and not the people.