EXACTLY AS PREDICTED JUSTICE ROBERTS AUTHORED THE OPINION

I did not have to open the opinion to know the result.  I saw the R for Roberts as the author and knew the result.  

This is not complex.  Roberts has an ego.  It was 100% predictable he would close out the term with the final opinion.  

THE NEWS MEDIA IS STILL NOT REPORTING THIS DECISION WAS 5/4.  THAT IS SCARY

Thomas as was expected leads the dissent.  His issue is, temporary workers or visitors do not intend to stay in the US, so the 14th Amendment does not protect them.

"By definition, temporary visitors to this country do not choose to make a permanent home here, and their children thus cannot claim the privilege of citizenship. Because the executive order is lawful at least to this extent, respondents’ facial challenge must fail"

What he is saying is a challenge to Trump's EO in its entirety is overbroad.

ASSOCIATE JUSTICE THOMAS SHOWED HE REALLY DOES NOT BELIEVE IN ORIGINAL INTENT.

Thomas wants to add language to the 14th Amendment to get to his result.  The authors of the 14th Amendment could have qualified born here with intent to stay.  They did not.

"The Fourteenth Amendment provides: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they re side.”

TRANSGENDER ATHLETES:

The decision was 9 zip that schools can separate athletes based on "biological sex."  All 9 Justices agree "biological sex" is sex assigned at birth.

My issue has always been Transgender advocates argue there are more than two genders but then want mixed players based on different genders.

So much time has been lost arguing over this.  The money needs to be raised and spent to promote transgender athletes. Now that is the real case.  Can a school district which separates athletes based on transgender status not fund Transgender athletes?

All Justices agreed on the result, but three felt the Court went too far.

KAVANAUGH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which ROBERTS, C. J., and THOMAS, ALITO, GORSUCH, and BARRETT, JJ., joined. THOMAS, J., and GORSUCH, J., filed concurring opinions. SOTOMAYOR, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part, in which KAGAN and JACKSON, JJ., joined. JACKSON, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part

When I read the above, I knew that as to the judgment the result was unanimous. 

We needed this result.  But it is not over.  Science will continue, and overtime science will decide how we decide gender.  During this period while science reviews gender, society will adjust to the changes.

But now the three liberals by agreeing with the application of Title IX, secured the ruling school districts mut fund athletic for Transgender student.  I am okay with the decision.

I have not read the entire opinion, but the elephant in the room seems to have been ignored.

We all have different hormone levels.  Some women have very elevated testosterone.  There have been calls to ban them from sports.  Really, so now people want to look to hormone levels and not just gender assigned at birth.  

This question needs to be addressed.  It is either at birth, or later in life when we change gender identity based on hormone levels.

TODAY'S OPINION PUTS THE COURT'S PREVIOUS FINANCE DECISION, CITIZENS UNITED ON STEROIDS

The political parties are now free to spend, spend, spend in coordination with political organizations.  

'