JUDGE MARTIN CHIUMINATE, PURE EVIL, OR MENTALLY DERANGED

It is his choice, does his conduct in court yesterday demonstrate he is pure evil, with nothing but contempt for the law, or is he deranged?  I do not know.  The Commission on Judicial Conduct will decide, and possibly the Court of Appeals.  Yesterday, the Court of Appeals reversed the previous corrupt Democrats and reinstated their authority over the court reporters and set up a court reporter with contempt.  I am pursuing the same against Kathryn Roberts, Gabby Garcia's court reporter.  She is so evil, knowing she has been sued over withholding a paid for transcript and illegally charging for transcripts, and facing investigation by the state, she acted as the court reporter yesterday.  She was asked if she would produce the record.  She was given until 3 pm yesterday. She refused.  I do not care if she loses everything.  John Doe and his father told me she looked shaken yesterday during the hearing. A substitute court reporter would have been more inclined to comply with the constitutional mandate and provide the record for free. 

LAURA PEREZ-REYES, WILL FACE A REMOVAL ACTION, AND IS NAMED IN THE CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

Yesterday the document which explained the basis for the recusal of Judge Banales, and the two supporting documents were rejected by Laura Perez-Reyes.  The law is black and white, the clerk must file anything presented for filing.  They have zero discretion.  The stated reason for refusing the filing was John Doe as a pro se cannot file directly with the clerk.  Absolutely false.  Pro Se's as a matter of law, do not have to file electronically.  Laura clearly engaged in a criminal obstruction of justice.

Laura Perez-Reyes conduct prevented the filing of the document.  Irma Gilman is as corrupt and contemptuous of the law as anyone I have ever seen. But then of course her husband is Pete Gilman, First ADA under Luis Saenz.  The notice of hearing which formed the basis for the recusal of Banales, was never filed because Irma Gilman who was ordered to file it, refused.  This made it impossible for the court to take judicial notice of same.  Irma Gilman needs to be indicted on obstruction of justice.

SO, WHAT HAPPENED IN COURT?

The night before I had to go to DHR in Edinburg.  I am almost 100% deaf.  The surgeon who will address this is out of DHR.  I need all records to be at DHR or the VA.  I was very impressed when I saw my new VA doctor at the Brownsville clinic. He already had the CT scan from DHR and had begun the process of getting me set up for infusion antibiotic therapy.  The infection is in the inner ear bone, which has caused my hearing loss. I am nearly 100% deaf. Until the treatment is done, we will not know if I will get me hearing back

My new doctor is short on clinical experience, but he works really hard to address my issues.  He is there for me, and I feel really good about the quality of care he will be providing me.  He does not live in the world of old medicine.  Sometimes a new doctor who is not tainted with old medicine is your best option.

SO, COURT

My roommate was able to get me to the hearing after going to DHR to pick me up.

During the introduction I stood up and ID myself. I very clearly said to Chiuminate I had been in the hospital all night and that I was nearly deaf and a disabled veteran. I explained to him I could not hear a thing.  He refused to turn on the microphone.  This was deliberate.  John Doe's father who has no hearing problems could not hear a thing either.

I cannot hear anything.  The judge knows this.  He knows I am a disabled veteran.  He knows I have been in the hospital all night.  I can see his lips moving so I tell him I cannot hear.  He does not care.

In a very loud and terse voice he tells me to "sit down" and then while laughing says to everyone "I bet he heard that."  This is more than enough for a public reprimand, and as a visiting judge be stripped of his authority to act as a visiting judge. When I recounted the story with the VA they were horrified.  

With the VA I will be filing a formal complaint against the judge.  I was told how to do it.  Saenz and the hopelessly corrupt FBI will not be able to run cover for him.

On the FBI I have discussed this before.  The DOJ lawyers asked Saenz not to prosecute Oscar de la Fuente in state court.   Oscar was a key material witness as to all his bribes with former DA Villalobos. The assistant US attorney made a big deal on the record, Oscar was promised nothing as to not being prosecuted in state court.

But then as we all know, Saenz did not prosecute Oscar.  

Saenz has the communication from the DOJ to not prosecute Oscar de la Fuente.  The FBI is concerned if they go after Saenz he will go public with the DOJ request to not prosecute Oscar. 

This is why I am moving forward in Washington. 

THE OTHER VIOLATIONS IN THE HEARING

Now understand I only know this because I was told same by John Doe and his father.  I could not hear.  And after the judge threatened to remove me from the courtroom if I continued to speak, I remained silent.

THE JUDGE ORDERED JOHN DOE to not explain anything in Spanish.  He could only use English.  He is more comfortable in Spanish on some things. A judge cannot order someone who cannot express themselves in English to only speak English or not be heard.

THE JUDGE THREATED TO ARREST THE FATHER BECAUSE HE WAS SHOWING FRUSTRATION

The Judge asked ADA Javier Lozano if he wanted to invoke the Rule so that the father and I could be removed from the courtroom and denied knowledge of the court's abuse of John Doe.  The Rule only applies to witnesses who are not acting as an advocate.  

As the father claims to have testified, he had no knowledge of anything.  He was not a witness.  The move was to leave John Doe unprotected. After the judge told the father he could step down, the judge according to the father noticed he was angry.  The judge asked him if he wanted to be arrested.  He was told to not leave the witness chair after the judge released him.  He was very shaken.

I am John Does' legal advocate under the ADA.  The question is before the court of appeals.  Judge Chiuminatto refused to stay the proceedings and defer to the court of appeals.  This is unheard of.

I am told he asked Sorola what the ADA is.  If a judge does not know what the ADA is, he should not be a judge.  I am told Sorola said it has something to do with disability, and then rambled on about something John Doe and the father could not understand.

The judge was told John Doe has invoked his right to represent himself and that any recognition of Louis Sorola or Karina Barraza would be a legal nullity under Art, 1 sec 29 of the Texas constitution.  The judge did not care.

I am told Sorola went on to continue to defame me.  He has no immunity in the case because he is not an attorney in the case.  Based on what I was told the new defamation will be added to the defamation suit.

THE CASE OF ADA JAVIER LOZANO

According to John Doe, Javier told him on the day of the bogus attempt at a plea bargain that the state had no evidence, but that he could not do anything about it because Saenz was calling the shots.  I have a lot to do. When John Doe saw Javier in court yesterday, he remembered that when Sorola and Rabb brought him back into the courtroom on the day Rabb was appointed, he asked Javier if it was true there was no evidence against him as told to him by Sorola and Rabb.  That is when Javiar Lozano told him there was no evidence but there was nothing, he could do about it.

This is more than enough to disbar Lozano and have him prosecuted for obstruction of justice.  It will happen. 

IF LOZANO HAD A BRAIN, WHICH HE DOES NOT, HE WOULD RESIGN IN A PUBLIC WAY EXPLAINING THERE IS NO EVIDENCE BUT SAENZ IS CALLING THE SHOTS

Nope Lozano such as court reporter Kathryn Roberts will lose everything.  They both need to present themselves to the FBI