LUIS SAENZ FORCES HIDAGLO COUNTY DA AND ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE NOE GONZALEZ TO OPEN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION AGAINST THE CLERK OF THE COURT OF APPEALS, AND THE LEGAL CLERK HELPING THE COURT IN THE CASE OF JOHN DOE
There is no issue, I have the letter from the Clerk of the Court obstructing justice and practicing law. With full knowledge Bobby Lerma was fired for ineffective assistance of counsel, Kathy S. Mills, Clerk of the 13th Court of Appeals, penned a letter saying Bobby Lerma was still John Doe's attorney and therefore as a matter of law [for the court to decide, not a clerk] John Doe is barred from filing anything with the court of appeals.
There is more, and such as the Supreme Court first, and now the DOJ is investing the leak in the Dobbs decision [reversal of Roe v. Wade], the Hidalgo County DA and court will investigate who mislead the court on the posture of John Doe's case.
SAENZ CANNOT HELP HIMSELF AND WILL CONTINUE TO DESTROY EVEYONE IN THE PATH OF THE JOHN DOES CASE
DO NOT FORGET, THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DISMISSED THE CASES AGAINST JOHN DOE FOR WANT OF PROBABLE CAUSE
I have not been able to find one attorney who could remember any DA prosecuting someone after the magistrate judge dismisses the case for want of probable cause. So why did Saenz pursue this case to the point of destroying so many careers? Saenz and Gilberto Hinojosa have a score to settle. Well, I have a criminal investigation to settle, and Saenz and Gilberto Hinojosa are the targets.
WILL HIDALGO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY COMPROMISE HIS OFFICE FOR LUIS SAENZ?
Toribio “Terry” Palacios, wants to be seen as new blood to the Office of the DA. The law compels him to allow me to take my evidence to the grand jury. Clerk Kathy S. Mills' letter speaks for itself.
The idea of Kathy S. Mills on her own without an order from the court can strike John Doe's pro se filings in favor of Bobby Lerma who, was fired for conspiring against John Doe, is more than surreal.
Clerks, whether of the court or a law clerk [a lawyer who helps the judges on the court] tend to favor abusing their office without insight as to the absurdity of their actions. If as a matter of law, John Doe cannot file anything with the court, then his notice of appeal too should have been removed the court docket.
THE LAW COMPELS A PRESUMPTION THE JUDGES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS ARE THE VICTIM OF BAD WORK PRODUCT BY A LAW CLERK
The first job of the judges is to ensure the law is followed. The second job is to protect the integrity of the court even if it means the clerk of the court or law clerk falls for poor judgment.
An additional filing this morning will ask Judges Silva, Peña, and Fonseca to open an investigation to include the law clerk who helped draft the order dated May 13, 2025. There are two verifiable mistakes in the order. One John Doe was convicted, absolutely false. Two Bobby Lerma is John Doe's attorney. False, the record and appeal clearly show Bobby Lerma was fired.
The presumption must be, Judges Silva, Peña, and Fonseca were misled by a mistaken law clerk. The intent of the clerk is to be decided after an investigation.
John Doe responded to the order dated May 13th, pointing out to the court there was no conviction, and Bobby Lerma had been fired for conspiring to engage in ineffective assistance of counsel.
Kathy S. Mills on her own issued a letter as an order striking John Doe's filing and forwarding it to Bobby Lerma, clearly stating only Bobby Lerma can speak for John Doe. If there was any question of futility Kathy S. Mills made sure it is absolutely futile for John Doe to seek justice from the court of appeals.
I am not Saenz, any of the lawyers and clerks aiding Saenz, or the court of appeals. I will parse the issue to a fine point.
Kathy S. Lewis cannot rely on the order of the court of appeals for striking John Doe's responsive filing asking that the court of appeals address the mistakes in the order dated May 13th.
You see I anticipate the court of appeals using its order to defend Kathy S. Mills. The court of appeals in its order did not order her to refuse forwarding filings by John Doe to the court of appeals judges. That is where she and the law clerk advising her made the mistake.
SO NOW WHAT
The next filing this morning will be a Motion for the Court of Appeals to open an investigation into how this happened, and to then recuse itself from the investigation and allow AG Paxton to investigate the matter. This is exactly what is happening at the Supreme Court level in the Dobbs case. If the Justices and clerks are subject to a DOJ investigation at the Supreme Court level, then the clerk of the 13th Court of Appeals and any law clerk helping her, and Judges Silva, Peña, Fonseca, should be okay with being the object of a Texas AG investigation.
THE SMART MOVE
Judges Silva, Peña, and Fonseca need to stay the trial court case, and then sua sponte recuse themselves with a request for assistance from Texas AG Ken Paxton. With a request for assistance to Ken Paxton, the Court of Criminal Appeals should be willing to stay all proceedings, namely assigning a new court of appeals to review the case of john Doe.
The question also remains will Hidalgo County DA Palacios and Administrative Judge Noe Gonzalez run cover for Saenz and the 13th Court of Appeals?
More to come tomorrow.